From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:17:18 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] staging: etnaviv: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <10294857.4Rufm0mRi7@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 06 November 2015 07:47:58 Julia Lawall wrote: > No need to set .owner here. The core will do it. > > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci > > CC: Christian Gmeiner > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall Patch looks good of course. It looks like the conversion is stagnating, probably as we seem to have some unmaintained drivers, slow maintainers, or cases that platform_no_drv_owner.cocci doesn't catch: for i in v3.18 v3.19 v4.0 v4.1 v4.2 v4.3 next/master ; do echo $i `git grep -A15 -w platform_driver $i | grep owner.*THIS_MODULE | wc -l` done v3.18 1798 v3.19 112 v4.0 98 v4.1 94 v4.2 98 v4.3 80 next/master 85 (this includes some false positives) Is there any way we can prevent new ones from creeping in after we remove the remaining ones? A compile-time check would be best, but I can't think of one as there are other subsystems that still set .owner. Maybe add a WARN_ON to platform_driver_register() and add that to linux-next on top of a patch (or series of patches) that removes the remaining ones? Arnd