Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: mvebu: disable I/O coherency on !SMP
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 16:40:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <10673994.kkICTRHJxL@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140717142720.GM21153@arm.com>

On Thursday 17 July 2014 15:27:20 Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 02:12:24PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 02:39:42PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Thursday 17 July 2014 09:33:42 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > > No - the problem is that we're running from the page table in question
> > > > with global mappings, and we need to switch all these mappings, including
> > > > the ones we're currently using to execute from.
> > > > 
> > > > We can't even create a new page table and switch to it because the
> > > > mappings in question are global mappings.
> > > > 
> > > > The only way to do that safely from an architectural point of view would
> > > > be to turn the MMU off, and drop back to assembly code to change the
> > > > page tables, and re-enable the MMU.  For something as obscure as Marvell's
> > > > coherency stuff, that's not something I want to see in core code.
> > > 
> > > Is this different from what we do in the LPAE version of
> > > early_paging_init()? That code already adjusts all the page
> > > table entries on a per-platform setting and should be very
> > > easy to extend for a modified procinfo->__cpu_mm_mmu_flags,
> > > and possibly able to extend for traditional (non-LPAE)
> > > page tables without a lot of duplication.
> > 
> > I'm going to have to profess no knowledge of how the LPAE stuff works.
> > LPAE is something I can't run, and something that I was not involved
> > in its creation.  Therefore, I know very little about it and zero
> > experience thereof.
> > 
> > From a glance over that function, I think that is unsafe for all the
> > reasons I've stated.  However, I'll pass this over to Will Deacon
> > to comment further on.
> 
> Just an FYI, but I've had to check internally to clarify the behaviour
> around TLB conflict aborts. We're changing live page tables here, but the
> *only* thing to differ is the output address, which I would hope is ok but
> need to check to be sure.

The two cases are slightly different:

- The existing keystone code changes the output address but not the flags
- The hypothetical mvebu code needs to change the flags but not the address.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-17 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-02 16:21 [PATCH 0/3] ARM: mvebu: disable I/O coherency on !SMP Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-02 16:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: mvebu: make the coherency_ll.S functions work with no coherency fabric Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-02 16:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: mvebu: disable I/O coherency on non-SMP situations on Armada 370/XP Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-02 16:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: mvebu: add missing of_node_put() call in coherency.c Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-02 16:27 ` [PATCH 0/3] ARM: mvebu: disable I/O coherency on !SMP Andrew Lunn
2014-07-02 16:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-02 17:18   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-02 17:58     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-02 20:28       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-02 21:33         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-02 21:50           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-17  8:24   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-17  8:33     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-17  8:45       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-07-17 10:27         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-17 10:16       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-17 12:39       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-17 13:12         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-17 14:27           ` Will Deacon
2014-07-17 14:40             ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-07-17 15:34               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-17 15:53                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-17 16:04                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-07-17 16:10                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-07-17 16:18                       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-07-28 17:46             ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=10673994.kkICTRHJxL@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox