Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
	jason98166@gmail.com
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jason Yang <jason98166@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: rockchip-samsung-dcphy: Enable runtime PM at PHY core level
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 15:36:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <10904774.nUPlyArG6x@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821-dcphy-rpm-v1-v1-1-a7db728b2539@gmail.com>

Am Freitag, 21. August 2026, 13:44:19 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Jason Yang via B4 Relay:
> From: Jason Yang <jason98166@gmail.com>
> 
> phy_create() only enables runtime PM on the new PHY device if the parent
> already has it enabled, and this driver enables it afterwards. The PHY
> device therefore never gets runtime PM, and phy_pm_runtime_get_sync()
> returns -ENOTSUPP for every phy_init() and phy_power_on(). The block is
> still resumed today, but only through the supplier link fw_devlink builds
> from the phys phandle, which fw_devlink=off and =permissive do not.
> 
> Move devm_pm_runtime_enable() before devm_phy_create(), as done for the
> sibling HDPTX PHY in commit 10ba8479f460 ("phy:
> phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx: Enable runtime PM at PHY core level").
> 
> Fixes: b2a1a2ae7818 ("phy: rockchip: Add Samsung MIPI D-/C-PHY driver")
> Signed-off-by: Jason Yang <jason98166@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>




      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-27 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-21 11:44 [PATCH] phy: rockchip-samsung-dcphy: Enable runtime PM at PHY core level Jason Yang via B4 Relay
2026-08-21 13:30 ` Sebastian Reichel
2026-08-27 13:36 ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=10904774.nUPlyArG6x@phil \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=heiko.stuebner@cherry.de \
    --cc=jason98166@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox