Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Viacheslav Bocharov <v@baodeep.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	Diederik de Haas <diederik@cknow-tech.com>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio: fix sleeping-in-atomic in shared-proxy; restore meson non-sleeping
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 16:16:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <112d2563-e650-4881-bba0-335f6a3fcb8a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <184d315b-a0a1-4792-8a40-1b4967025916@samsung.com>

On 11/06/2026 9:26 am, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Viachesla,
> 
> On 10.06.2026 17:32, Viacheslav Bocharov wrote:
>> gpio-shared-proxy chooses its descriptor lock (mutex vs spinlock) from
>> the underlying chip's can_sleep, but under that lock it calls config and
>> direction ops that reach sleeping pinctrl paths. On a controller with
>> non-sleeping MMIO value ops the lock is a spinlock, so a sleeping call
>> runs from atomic context:
>>
>>    BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context
>>      ... pinctrl_gpio_set_config <- gpiochip_generic_config
>>      <- gpio_shared_proxy_set_config (voting spinlock held)
>>      <- ... <- mmc_pwrseq_simple_probe
>>
>> This was reported on Khadas VIM3 and worked around for Amlogic by
>> commit 28f240683871 ("pinctrl: meson: mark the GPIO controller as
>> sleeping"), which marked the whole meson controller sleeping. That
>> workaround broke atomic value-path consumers: w1-gpio (1-Wire bitbang)
>> no longer detects devices, because its IRQ-disabled read slot calls the
>> non-cansleep gpiod_*_value() and now hits WARN_ON(can_sleep) per bit.
>>
>> Patch 1 fixes the proxy locking generically (always a sleeping mutex).
>> Patch 2 then restores meson can_sleep=false, fixing 1-Wire.
>>
>> Patch 1 has a trade-off: a proxied GPIO becomes sleeping, so consumers
>> gating on gpiod_cansleep() change behaviour. No current device needs
>> atomic (non-cansleep) value access on a shared GPIO -- every report
>> (Khadas VIM3, ODROID-M1, my test on JetHub D1+) is a shared reset line
>> (eMMC/SDIO pwrseq or PCIe reset) driven through the cansleep accessors,
>> which is what the proxy exists to vote on. An alternative that keeps
>> atomic value access (split locking) is possible but adds a second lock
>> and new race windows. I went with the simpler, verified approach and
>> would appreciate guidance on whether the atomic value path must be
>> preserved.
>>
>> The two are a unit: patch 2 must not be applied without patch 1,
>> otherwise the original VIM3 splat returns on boards that share a meson
>> GPIO -- please keep the order. I have not Cc'd stable; I will request
>> stable backports separately once both patches have landed.
>>
>> Viacheslav Bocharov (2):
>>    gpio: shared-proxy: always serialize with a sleeping mutex
>>    pinctrl: meson: restore non-sleeping GPIO access
> 
> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> 
> This probably also affects the similar changes in Rockchip GPIO driver done
> by the following commits:
> 20cf2aed89ac ("gpio: rockchip: mark the GPIO controller as sleeping")
> 7ca497be0016 ("gpio: rockchip: Stop calling pinctrl for set_direction")
> 
> I've checked this patchset with these two reverted and no warning was reported.

If it hadn't already been fixed, then indeed I guess this might make 
20cf2aed89ac redundant. However, 7ca497be0016 is still an objective 
improvement either way, since that driver never needed to call pinctrl 
at all (it was seemingly just an artefact of how the GPIO code was 
originally implemented within the pinctrl driver itself).

Thanks,
Robin.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-23 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20260610153425eucas1p29d20a835114a28b15cb12ea00534e074@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2026-06-10 15:32 ` [PATCH 0/2] gpio: fix sleeping-in-atomic in shared-proxy; restore meson non-sleeping Viacheslav Bocharov
2026-06-10 15:32   ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio: shared-proxy: always serialize with a sleeping mutex Viacheslav Bocharov
2026-06-16 12:53     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-06-10 15:32   ` [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: meson: restore non-sleeping GPIO access Viacheslav Bocharov
2026-06-11  8:26   ` [PATCH 0/2] gpio: fix sleeping-in-atomic in shared-proxy; restore meson non-sleeping Marek Szyprowski
2026-06-11  9:27     ` Viacheslav
2026-06-23 15:16     ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2026-06-11  9:53   ` Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=112d2563-e650-4881-bba0-335f6a3fcb8a@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=brgl@kernel.org \
    --cc=diederik@cknow-tech.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linusw@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=v@baodeep.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox