From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com (Claudiu.Beznea at microchip.com) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 13:10:46 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] power: reset: at91-reset: enable I-cache for at91sam9260_reset In-Reply-To: References: <20181007125815.8392-1-jonas@threetimestwo.org> <80993f04-c8ce-5a71-4f04-7edab5e1857b@microchip.com> <2351196.3BzoFE0xYq@ws-140106> Message-ID: <11b4bcb4-8882-bdd2-c7f7-6a74d0758cbc@microchip.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 17.10.2018 15:17, Jonas Danielsson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 4:52 PM Alexander Stein > wrote: >> >> On Tuesday, October 16, 2018, 3:30:24 PM CEST Claudiu.Beznea at microchip.com wrote: >>> Hi Jonas, >>> >>> On 07.10.2018 15:57, Jonas Danielsson wrote: >>>> From: Jonas Danielsson >>>> >>>> This fixes a bug where our embedded system (AT91SAM9260 based) would >>>> hang at reboot. At the most we managed 16 boot loops without a hang. >>>> >>>> With this patch applied the problem has not been observed and the board >>>> has managed above 250 boot loops. >>>> >>>> The AT91SAM9260 datasheet tells us that with the instruction cache >>>> disabled all instructions are fetched from SDRAM. And we have an errata >>>> telling us we must power down the SDRAM before issuing cpu reset. >>>> >>>> This means we need the instruction cache enabled in at91sam9260_reset() >>>> At the moment it is being disabled in cpu_proc_fin() which is called from >>>> arch/arm/kernel/reboot.c. >>> >>> Are you using kexec reboot or implemented hibernate mode on this machine? >>> I'm seeing cpu_proc_fin() is called only in case of kexec reboot or >>> switching to hibernate mode. >>> >>> In case of normal reboot (e.g. reboot command) machine_restart() from >>> arch/arm/kernel/reboot.c is called. Please correct me if I'm wrong. >> >> Another location is cpu_reset() aka cpu_arm926_reset() in proc-arm926.S >> which also disables I-cache. But I can't track down a callstack >> ending there. >> > > We take the normal path of sys_reboot => kernel_restart => machine_restart ... > > I added code to print the c1 register in different paths. And I-cache > is enabled. > So now I am really confused about why the patch worked. Just saying... maybe your instructions add some delay on the execution path and this is why it helps... try to access cp15 co-processor for read and write back the value you read without actually to modify it, to see if this could be the reason: e.g.: mrc p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 0 orr r1, r1, #4096 // whatever is in r1, doesn't matter mcr p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 0 Thank you, Claudiu Beznea > >> Best regards, >> Alexander > > Jonas > >> >> >> > >