From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: amelie.delaunay@st.com (Amelie DELAUNAY) Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 11:47:12 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: enable STM32 SPI In-Reply-To: References: <1526566904-24514-1-git-send-email-amelie.delaunay@st.com> <1526566904-24514-4-git-send-email-amelie.delaunay@st.com> Message-ID: <120d8997-3184-bfed-26b7-e0ac7d995b74@st.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Alex On 06/26/2018 10:44 AM, Alexandre Torgue wrote: > Hi Am?lie > > On 05/17/2018 04:21 PM, Amelie Delaunay wrote: >> Enable the STM32 SPI driver, implemented on STM32MP1 SoC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay >> --- >> ? arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 1 + >> ? 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig >> b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig >> index 89167cd..f990335 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig >> @@ -411,6 +411,7 @@ CONFIG_SPI_S3C64XX=m >> ? CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF=m >> ? CONFIG_SPI_SH_HSPI=y >> ? CONFIG_SPI_SIRF=y >> +CONFIG_SPI_STM32=y >> ? CONFIG_SPI_SUN4I=y >> ? CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y >> ? CONFIG_SPI_TEGRA114=y >> > > Driver which are are not "vital" to boot STM32 platform should be > defined as module. It's the case for this one. Isn't ? > You're right. I'll send v2 with CONFIG_SPI_STM32=m ASAP. Should I resend the whole patchset (with DT), or just this patch and you take the DT patches as they are ? Regards, Amelie