From: Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-sr-som: mux ethernet phy reset signals input
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 09:34:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <120f7936-97bd-46cd-bb8c-90fca27d2140@solid-run.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240903124256.kmlkjcihl6zyzgiu@commuting>
Am 03.09.24 um 14:42 schrieb Nishanth Menon:
> On 11:52-20240903, Josua Mayer wrote:
>> Specifically on AM64 SoM design, the DP83869 phys have a chance to lock
>> up if reset gpio changes state. Update the pinmux to input-only,
>> strongly enforcing that these signals are left floating at all times.
>>
>> This avoids sporadic phy initialisation errors mostly encountered during
>> power-on and reset. In this state the phys respond to all mdio messages
>> with a constant response, recovering only after power-cycle.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - update commit message with additional details
>> - rebased on v6.11-rc1
>> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240704-am64-phy-lockup-v1-1-4a38ded44f9d@solid-run.com
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sr-som.dtsi | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sr-som.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sr-som.dtsi
>> index c19d0b8bbf0f..b1f06071df4c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sr-som.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sr-som.dtsi
>> @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ AM64X_IOPAD(0x0278, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* EXTINTn.GPIO1_70 */
>> ethernet_phy0_default_pins: ethernet-phy0-default-pins {
>> pinctrl-single,pins = <
>> /* reset */
>> - AM64X_IOPAD(0x0154, PIN_OUTPUT, 7) /* PRG1_PRU1_GPO19.GPIO0_84 */
>> + AM64X_IOPAD(0x0154, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* PRG1_PRU1_GPO19.GPIO0_84 */
>> /* reference clock */
>> AM64X_IOPAD(0x0274, PIN_OUTPUT, 5) /* EXT_REFCLK1.CLKOUT0 */
>> >;
>> @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ AM64X_IOPAD(0x0274, PIN_OUTPUT, 5) /* EXT_REFCLK1.CLKOUT0 */
>> ethernet_phy1_default_pins: ethernet-phy1-default-pins {
>> pinctrl-single,pins = <
>> /* reset */
>> - AM64X_IOPAD(0x0150, PIN_OUTPUT, 7) /* PRG1_PRU1_GPO18.GPIO0_20 */
>> + AM64X_IOPAD(0x0150, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* PRG1_PRU1_GPO18.GPIO0_20 */
>> /* led0, external pull-down on SoM */
>> AM64X_IOPAD(0x0128, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* PRG1_PRU1_GPO8.GPIO0_73 */
>> /* led1/rxer */
>> @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ AM64X_IOPAD(0x011c, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* PRG1_PRU1_GPO5.GPIO0_70 */
>> ethernet_phy2_default_pins: ethernet-phy2-default-pins {
>> pinctrl-single,pins = <
>> /* reset */
>> - AM64X_IOPAD(0x00d4, PIN_OUTPUT, 7) /* PRG1_PRU0_GPO7.GPIO0_52 */
>> + AM64X_IOPAD(0x00d4, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* PRG1_PRU0_GPO7.GPIO0_52 */
> PIN_INPUT is bi-directional despite what the name states.
Good point, I will try to measure the electrical signal during boot
and better understand what exactly happens.
Guess is there are glitches when either u-boot or linux
are changing the pinmux registers.
Hence whatever glitch-free value we end up picking for u-boot
should be reflected in linux dts also.
> Either way, it
> is a bit late for me to pick things up.
>
>> /* led0, external pull-down on SoM */
>> AM64X_IOPAD(0x00d8, PIN_INPUT, 7) /* PRG1_PRU0_GPO8.GPIO0_53 */
>> /* led1/rxer */
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: 8400291e289ee6b2bf9779ff1c83a291501f017b
>> change-id: 20240704-am64-phy-lockup-107ea5ffa228
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-14 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-03 8:52 [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-sr-som: mux ethernet phy reset signals input Josua Mayer
2024-09-03 12:42 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-09-14 9:34 ` Josua Mayer [this message]
2024-10-06 15:42 ` Josua Mayer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=120f7936-97bd-46cd-bb8c-90fca27d2140@solid-run.com \
--to=josua@solid-run.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kristo@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).