From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: joe@perches.com (Joe Perches) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:13:58 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Move ARM lists to infradead In-Reply-To: References: <1253117388.2567.17.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20090916181018.GA19728@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <1253125008.2567.32.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Message-ID: <1253132038.10465.5.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 22:03 +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > Joe Perches writes: > > I believe it's still moderated. > Does that matter to the point we have to put it in the file? > Non-spam from non-subscribers passes through, right? The "moderated for > non-subscribers" suggests that one should subscribe prior to posting, > which is IMHO not the case. I don't much care which is selected, but I think it's clear moderated doesn't mean subscribers-only. "moderated for non-subscribers" means there might be a rejection or a delay before a message is forwarded to a list. Here are the lists that are marked "moderated" in MAINTAINERS $ grep moderated MAINTAINERS | sort | uniq L: alsa-devel at alsa-project.org (moderated for non-subscribers) L: bluesmoke-devel at lists.sourceforge.net (moderated for non-subscribers) L: linux-am33-list at redhat.com (moderated for non-subscribers) L: linux-fbdev-devel at lists.sourceforge.net (moderated for non-subscribers) L: linux-geode at lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) L: linux-zigbee-devel at lists.sourceforge.net (moderated for non-subscribers) L: ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com (moderated for non-subscribers) L: rds-devel at oss.oracle.com (moderated for non-subscribers) L: tpmdd-devel at lists.sourceforge.net (moderated for non-subscribers)