From: dcbw@redhat.com (Dan Williams)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: MXC MMC driver and SDIO peripherals
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:11:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1256749864.3850.44.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091028164752.GN29442@buzzloop.caiaq.de>
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 17:47 +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 01:15:19PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 21:20 +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > we're having trouble getting SDIO connected harware to fly on MX31 based
> > > designs. In particular, a SD8686 chip supported by the libertas_sdio
> > > driver will hang forever when built without CONFIG_MMC_DEBUG=y. With
> > > that option selected, however, the behaviour is a little different, and
> > > I can at least see the following messages on a recent 2.6.32-rc5 based
> > > MX31 tree.
> > >
> > > Is there any common pitfall for such setups? I did more or less the same
> > > thing on PXAs (same WLAN chip, same kind of interface, same firmware),
> > > and haven't seen any such effects, so I suspect the MXC specific parts
> > > to be the reason for that. Any ideas?
> >
> > Any idea what quirks your SDHC is using if any? Does it require PIO or
> > can it do DMA? Does it have any transfer restrictions on block size or
> > bit-width? What is the debug output of the MMC stack when loading the
> > module for your SDHC?
>
> I did some more research on this and it turns out that the problem is
> related to multi block transfers. At least, this is when it first
> occurs.
>
> The libertas SDIO driver downloads two firmwares to the device, one
> 'helper' and one 'real' firmware The first one only uses chunks of 64
> bytes each and that seems to work fine. The real firmware, however,
> loads in 512 bytes chunks which the SDIO core breaks up into 16 blocks
> of 32 bytes. And this is where the MXC host controller bails out with a
> CRC error. Unfortunately, it does not give any more detailed information
> about what exactly went wrong.
>
> The effect might be related to an errata entry[1], which is what I'm
> currently investigating. To do so, I would like to limit the the
> communication to singe-block transfers, just to exclude all other
> possible (electrical, clock speed, ...) issues. I did that by setting
> mmc->max_blk_count to 1 in the the host controller, but then again,
> the libertas driver and/or the firmware doesn't like that and dies in
> if_sdio_pro_real() with
>
> firmware wants 17 bytes
> firmware helper signalled error
>
> Any idea how to get that working with only single block small transfers?
Just a note; single-block transfers will probably kill your wifi
performance, especially if the errata are true. When the libertas
driver sends network data packets it sends them with
ret = sdio_writesb(card->func, card->ioport,
packet->buffer, packet->nb);
so if your packet is normal ethernet 1500 bytes, breaking that up in to
47 single block transfers of 32-bytes each is going to be slow...
Dan
> Btw - there's a number of things missing for SDIO in the MXC MMC driver
> which I implemented/fixed. I'll send patches as soon as I have more
> confidence about the whole setup.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
>
> [1] Errata IDs TLSbo91748 and TLSbo78667 from
> http://www.freescale.com/files/32bit/doc/errata/MCIMX31CE.pdf?fpsp=1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> libertas-dev mailing list
> libertas-dev at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/libertas-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-28 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-21 19:20 MXC MMC driver and SDIO peripherals Daniel Mack
2009-10-21 20:15 ` Dan Williams
2009-10-21 20:51 ` Daniel Mack
2009-10-22 8:19 ` Sascha Hauer
2009-10-22 11:05 ` tommy tommy
2009-10-22 16:41 ` Matt Hsu
2009-10-28 16:47 ` Daniel Mack
2009-10-28 17:06 ` Dan Williams
2009-10-28 17:19 ` Daniel Mack
2009-10-28 18:46 ` Dan Williams
2009-10-29 10:27 ` Daniel Mack
2009-11-02 20:00 ` Dan Williams
2009-10-28 17:11 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2009-10-28 17:21 ` Daniel Mack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1256749864.3850.44.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).