From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:53:56 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] RealView: Add sparsemem support for the RealView
	PBX platform
In-Reply-To: <20091109103957.GB15646@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <20091015121927.739.32071.stgit@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>
	<20091015122209.739.42849.stgit@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>
	<20091108174503.GB28368@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<1257760300.21820.23.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>
	<20091109101822.GA15646@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<1257762846.21820.27.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>
	<20091109103957.GB15646@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <1257764036.21820.29.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 10:39 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 10:34:06AM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > I don't think it's worth the hassle anyway. If you have
> > REALVIEW_HIGH_PHYS_OFFSET disabled and FLATMEM, you end up with only
> > 256MB of RAM available, I don't really see a point in this
> > configuration. With the new patch, if you don't like SPARSEMEM (maybe
> > for benchmarking reasons), just enable REALVIEW_HIGH_PHYS_OFFSET.
> > 
> > So, are you OK with the latest patch?
> 
> In that case, yes.

OK, I updated the for-rmk branch.

Thanks.

-- 
Catalin