From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dwalker@codeaurora.org (Daniel Walker)
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:49:29 -0800
Subject: [RFC 18/18] arm: mm: qsd8x50: Fix incorrect permission faults
In-Reply-To: <20100119174313.GE1323@shareable.org>
References: <20100119171033.GA1323@shareable.org>
	<1263922428.1951.63.camel@m0nster>
	<20100119174313.GE1323@shareable.org>
Message-ID: <1263923369.1951.68.camel@m0nster>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 17:43 +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Daniel Walker wrote:
> > Everything I release will ultimately be licensed under the GPLv2
> > regardless of the license in the current files.. So it's just a matter
> > of removing that old license ..
> 
> Ok.  Please do :-)
> 
> > > For another file, I'm not sure that adding "All rights reserved" is ok.
> > > Under the GPL, all rights are _not_ reserved:
> > 
> > This would be a problem because our lawyers mandate this.. AFAIK, it
> > doesn't change the licensing tho.
> 
> If it doesn't change the license, why is it mandated?

I don't know .. But I would guess it has to do with re-licensing under a
BSD license potentially .

> Sounds like your lawyers aren't very familiar with open source licensing.

I'm not sure how familiar they are with it ..

Daniel