From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: Change the mandatory barriers implementation
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:16:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1266927403.3123.56.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100223111036.GA10501@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 11:10 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:01:05AM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > -#define mb() do { if (arch_is_coherent()) dmb(); else barrier(); } while (0)
> > -#define rmb() do { if (arch_is_coherent()) dmb(); else barrier(); } while (0)
> > -#define wmb() do { if (arch_is_coherent()) dmb(); else barrier(); } while (0)
> > +#define mb() dsb()
> > +#define rmb() dmb()
> > +#define wmb() dsb()
>
> What is the reason for getting rid of the arch_is_coherent() bit here
> and imposing non-compiler barriers on everything?
The original code defines the mandatory barriers only if
__LINUX_ARCH_ARM__ >= 7 || CONFIG_SMP. However we still need them for
earlier architectures (v6). We can change the #if here to test for
earlier architectures as well and only do the arch_is_coherent() check
for some early implementations that don't have barriers.
> This also breaks ARMv3 since you now issue a mcr for the write buffer
> on architectures which have no write buffer.
Is this the case for another #ifdef? I can add it.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-23 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-23 11:01 [PATCH 1/4] ARM: Change the mandatory barriers implementation Catalin Marinas
2010-02-23 11:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-23 12:16 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2010-02-23 12:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-23 15:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-02-23 15:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-23 16:02 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-02-23 18:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-23 18:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-03-01 3:37 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-02-26 15:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-03-01 3:44 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-02-23 12:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-02-23 12:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-23 11:35 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-02-23 11:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-23 17:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-02-23 17:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-02-23 18:04 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1266927403.3123.56.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).