From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: AACI broken with commit 29a4f2d3
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:02:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1269518557.10064.14.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BAB4DE8.1030707@mvista.com>
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 11:50 +0000, Philby John wrote:
> On 03/25/2010 05:06 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:30:19 +0000,
> > Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:12:52PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >>> At Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:18:06 -0000,
> >>> Will Deacon wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Catalin,
> >>>>
> >>>>> aaci: Use writew() to the AC97_POWERDOWN 16-bit register
> >>>>>
> >>>>> From: Catalin Marinas<catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The writel() introduced by commit 29a4f2d3 generates an alignment fault
> >>>>> on ARM.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas<catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> >>>>> Cc: Philby John<pjohn@in.mvista.com>
> >>>>> Cc: Takashi Iwai<tiwai@suse.de>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> sound/arm/aaci.c | 2 +-
> >>>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/sound/arm/aaci.c b/sound/arm/aaci.c
> >>>>> index 656e474..d66d4ff 100644
> >>>>> --- a/sound/arm/aaci.c
> >>>>> +++ b/sound/arm/aaci.c
> >>>>> @@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ static int __devinit aaci_probe_ac97(struct aaci *aaci)
> >>>>> struct snd_ac97 *ac97;
> >>>>> int ret;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - writel(0, aaci->base + AC97_POWERDOWN);
> >>>>> + writew(0, aaci->base + AC97_POWERDOWN);
> >>>>> /*
> >>>>> * Assert AACIRESET for 2us
> >>>>> */
> >>>>
> >>>> A writel() looks wrong anyway because even if it could succeed, it would
> >>>> send half of its write to AC97_EXTENDED_ID, which sounds suspiciously read-only
> >>>> to me.
> >>>>
> >>>> Tested-by: Will Deacon<will.deacon@arm.com>
> >>>
> >>> Looking back at the original patch again, I wonder now whether using
> >>> AC97_* for the register offset here is really correct. Usually AC97
> >>> registers are accessed indirectly.
> >>>
> >>> Is it just same 0x26, or is this intentional?
> >>
> >> The original patch is total crap.
> >>
> >> 1. You can't access AC97 registers via writel.
> >> 2. If the offset is 0x26 (AACI_CSCH2 + AACI_IE + 2), this is writing to
> >> reserved bits in channel 2's interrupt enable register which has
> >> nothing to do with the slot 1/2 transmit registers.
> >>
> >> The patch could never have been tested in the first place.
> >
> > Thanks for checking. Now I wonder why this fixed the original issue
> > at all. Obviously something wrong in either testing or problem
> > analysis.
> >
> > Anyway, it's better to revert the patch first...
>
> This was tested throughly but not for alignment and to verify the fix is
> easy. All you need to do is revert the commit and then type reboot at
> the command prompt. On reboot you will get "aaci-pl041 fpga:04: ac97
> read back fail" failures, rendering audio non-functional on an ARM1176.
I can confirm that it solves the reset issue on other RealView boards as
well. Whether it's the correct fix I can't tell.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-25 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-24 13:51 AACI broken with commit 29a4f2d3 Catalin Marinas
2010-03-24 15:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-03-24 15:18 ` Will Deacon
2010-03-25 11:12 ` Takashi Iwai
2010-03-25 11:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-25 11:36 ` Takashi Iwai
2010-03-25 11:50 ` Philby John
2010-03-25 12:02 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2010-03-25 12:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-26 11:28 ` Philby John
2010-03-26 13:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-03-26 13:10 ` Philby John
2010-03-26 13:24 ` Mark Brown
2010-03-26 13:54 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-03-26 14:00 ` Philby John
2010-03-26 14:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-03-26 14:08 ` Mark Brown
2010-03-26 14:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-03-26 14:15 ` Mark Brown
2010-03-26 16:07 ` Philby John
2010-03-26 21:11 ` Takashi Iwai
2010-03-29 7:45 ` Philby John
2010-03-29 7:57 ` Takashi Iwai
2010-04-06 8:12 ` Takashi Iwai
2010-04-06 17:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-04-06 18:07 ` Takashi Iwai
2010-04-12 18:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-04-13 7:48 ` Takashi Iwai
2010-03-26 22:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-26 18:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-25 12:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1269518557.10064.14.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).