From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dwalker@codeaurora.org (Daniel Walker) Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:55:03 -0700 Subject: [GIT PULL] generic arm for MSM try2 In-Reply-To: References: <1269560155.21793.89.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <20100328214901.GA8614@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <1269881703.17124.3.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 19:51 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 04:35:55PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > Ok, attempt #2 .. It's the same set of patches , only it's against > > > mainline linus tree of the moment. I force updated it into the same > > > "for-russell" branch. > > > > > > btw, you might want to pay close attention to the "Fix incorrect > > > permission faults" patch. That's the only non-small patch in the queue. > > > > Well, I don't think it's fair on those who created abort-ev7.S to go > > throwing a boilerplate copyright on the file which makes it look like > > "Code Aurora Forum." wrote the entire thing. > > When I brought up this point back in January or so, it was agreed that > such copyright notices were going to be removed. > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-January/008824.html I don't recall any hard agreements on it. Even reading the thread now, it had to do with a minor change of only a few lines .. Daniel