From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] Prohibit ioremap() on kernel managed RAM
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:38:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1272645511.22683.1.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100430163356.GV2619@mvista.com>
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 17:33 +0100, George G. Davis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 03:40:58PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > > Above change is necessary but what an alternative approach is for this.
> > > There are many use case where ioremap* is needed.
> >
> > This is a very difficult issue to answer; the only way we can safely
> > remap RAM with different attributes is if we disable the existing
> > mappings - but since we create those with 1MB sections, that's far
> > from easy to achieve.
> >
> > I think a viable safe solution is to set aside some RAM at boot (which
> > the kernel doesn't manage at all) and then use ioremap on that; that
> > approach will still work with this patch in place.
>
> So cases such as the omapfb driver which use reserve_bootmem() (in
> arch/arm/plat-omap/fb.c) and then later use ioremap_wc() to remap
> reserved memory (in drivers/video/omap2/omapfb/omapfb-main.c)
> will no longer work with this change.
Another solution would be to allow the unmapping of sections from the
kernel linear mapping. I think x86 does this already for the AGP
aperture.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-30 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-23 14:40 [RFC] Prohibit ioremap() on kernel managed RAM Russell King
2010-04-30 16:33 ` George G. Davis
2010-04-30 16:38 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2010-05-01 6:24 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-05-01 9:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-03 15:59 ` George G. Davis
2010-05-04 15:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-05 16:23 ` George G. Davis
2010-05-05 16:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-05 16:33 ` George G. Davis
2010-04-30 18:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-04-30 22:30 ` George G. Davis
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-08 9:48 Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-04-23 14:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-04-23 14:27 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1272645511.22683.1.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).