From: dwalker@codeaurora.org (Daniel Walker)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] generic arm for MSM try 3
Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 12:13:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1272913996.16935.50.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100503104431.GA29919@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 11:44 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 04:18:00PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 11:18 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > I dropped the copyright and rebased, but everything else is the same as
> > > the prior pull request.
> > >
> > > The following changes since commit 27ee8963708185b96bc84a149eb5336a249a7497:
> > > Linus Torvalds (1):
> > > Merge branch 'urgent' of git://git.kernel.org/.../brodo/pcmcia-2.6
> > >
> > > are available in the git repository at:
> > >
> > > git://codeaurora.org/quic/kernel/dwalker/linux-msm.git for-russell
> >
> > Did I get this one wrong somehow, or are you not accepting pull requests
> > right now?
>
> No. In case you didn't notice, I've been offline from 22nd to 29th April
> caused by BT planned engineering works going wrong. However, I'm back
> online for the time being using alternative arrangements, and I still
> regard my 'net connection to be 'at risk'.
Yeah, I noticed that after I sent this originally. It too bad about your
BT troubles. I hope that get squared away soon.
> Could you please tell me what is different in this pull request compared
> to try 2? I'm asking because it appears your tree is identical to try 2,
> in spite of:
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 03:59:53PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 22:49 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > Well, I don't think it's fair on those who created abort-ev7.S to go
> > > throwing a boilerplate copyright on the file which makes it look like
> > > "Code Aurora Forum." wrote the entire thing.
> >
> > Ok, I updated the same branch .. It's minus the copyright and license ,
> > and I rebased it onto a more recent linus tree ..
Yes, I must have mistakenly dropped the "-f" from the push. I did
another rebase, and "push -f" just now. It should be as advertised
above. The same as the original pull requests only with out the
copyright.
Sorry for all the attempts ..
Daniel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-03 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-20 18:18 [GIT PULL] generic arm for MSM try 3 Daniel Walker
2010-04-26 23:18 ` Daniel Walker
2010-05-03 10:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-03 19:13 ` Daniel Walker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1272913996.16935.50.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com \
--to=dwalker@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).