From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jamie@linuxuk.org (Jamie Bennett)
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 17:27:51 +0100
Subject: Boot interface for device trees on ARM
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTil3vDAN4QIJJImk8MnQklisqFJq_RBc7c9VEZxl@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201005181054.32325.jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1005172341200.12758@xanadu.home>
	<AANLkTilJl9_NHiT1LITG7UbA9S7OYsnGMcDAsFEEx5Ob@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1005191055180.12758@xanadu.home>
	<20100519200819.GF1693@shareable.org>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1005191614580.12758@xanadu.home>
	<AANLkTil3vDAN4QIJJImk8MnQklisqFJq_RBc7c9VEZxl@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1274459271.2178.14.camel@zander>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 10:24 -0600, John Rigby wrote:
> Wow, no responses for almost two days, does that mean consensus has
> been reached?

Consensus on device-tree enabled ARM hardware, surely not ;)

Regards,
Jamie.