From: jeremy.kerr@canonical.com (Jeremy Kerr)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC,PATCH 0/2] Common struct clk implementation, v3
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 19:56:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1275479804.137633.565764505843.0.gpush@pororo> (raw)
Hi all,
These patches are an attempt to allow platforms to share clock code. At
present, the definitions of 'struct clk' are local to platform code,
which makes allocating and initialising cross-platform clock sources
difficult, and makes it impossible to compile a single image containing
support for two ARM platforms with different struct clks.
The two patches are for the architecture-independent kernel code,
introducing the common clk infrastructure. The changelog for the first
patch includes details about the new clock definitions.
As requested by rmk, I've put together a small series of patches
illustrating the usage of the common struct clock on the ARM imx51
platform. These are available in my git tree:
git://kernel.ubuntu.com/jk/dt/linux-2.6
in the clk-common-mx51 branch (clk-common..clk-common-mx51).
The approach I've taken with the imx51 port is to temporarly duplicate
the platform-common clock code (ie, for all mxc-based boards) to enable
usage of the common struct clk on one machine (imx51), while leaving the
others as-is. For a proper platform-wide usage of the common struct clk,
we'd be better off doing the whole platform at once. However, mx51 is
the only mxc-based HW I have, hence the duplicated example port.
In the example port, the first change simply converts the mxc's struct
clk to a struct clk_mxc, using the new API. The subsequent patches move
certain clocks to more specific data structures (eg clk_fixed and
clk_pll) where possible.
Ben Herrenschmidt is looking at using common struct clk code for powerpc
too, hence the kernel-wide approach.
Comments most welcome.
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
v3:
* do clock usage refcounting in common code
* provide sample port
v2:
* no longer ARM-specific
* use clk_operations
---
Jeremy Kerr (2):
Add a common struct clk
clk: Generic support for fixed-rate clocks
next reply other threads:[~2010-06-02 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-02 11:56 Jeremy Kerr [this message]
2010-06-02 11:56 ` [RFC,PATCH 1/2] Add a common struct clk Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-02 12:03 ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-03 3:21 ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-03 8:13 ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-03 10:24 ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-03 11:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-06-04 0:06 ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-04 1:43 ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-04 1:40 ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-06-03 21:09 ` Ryan Mallon
2010-06-03 23:45 ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-02 11:56 ` [RFC,PATCH 2/2] clk: Generic support for fixed-rate clocks Jeremy Kerr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1275479804.137633.565764505843.0.gpush@pororo \
--to=jeremy.kerr@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox