From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: atomic ops: add memory constraints to inline asm
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:04:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1277906688-12065-4-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1277906688-12065-3-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>
Currently, the 32-bit and 64-bit atomic operations on ARM do not
include memory constraints in the inline assembly blocks. In the
case of barrier-less operations [for example, atomic_add], this
means that the compiler may constant fold values which have actually
been modified by a call to an atomic operation.
This issue can be observed in the atomic64_test routine in
<kernel root>/lib/atomic64_test.c:
00000000 <test_atomic64>:
0: e1a0c00d mov ip, sp
4: e92dd830 push {r4, r5, fp, ip, lr, pc}
8: e24cb004 sub fp, ip, #4
c: e24dd008 sub sp, sp, #8
10: e24b3014 sub r3, fp, #20
14: e30d000d movw r0, #53261 ; 0xd00d
18: e3011337 movw r1, #4919 ; 0x1337
1c: e34c0001 movt r0, #49153 ; 0xc001
20: e34a1aa3 movt r1, #43683 ; 0xaaa3
24: e16300f8 strd r0, [r3, #-8]!
28: e30c0afe movw r0, #51966 ; 0xcafe
2c: e30b1eef movw r1, #48879 ; 0xbeef
30: e34d0eaf movt r0, #57007 ; 0xdeaf
34: e34d1ead movt r1, #57005 ; 0xdead
38: e1b34f9f ldrexd r4, [r3]
3c: e1a34f90 strexd r4, r0, [r3]
40: e3340000 teq r4, #0
44: 1afffffb bne 38 <test_atomic64+0x38>
48: e59f0004 ldr r0, [pc, #4] ; 54 <test_atomic64+0x54>
4c: e3a0101e mov r1, #30
50: ebfffffe bl 0 <__bug>
54: 00000000 .word 0x00000000
The atomic64_set (0x38-0x44) writes to the atomic64_t, but the
compiler doesn't see this, assumes the test condition is always
false and generates an unconditional branch to __bug. The rest of the
test is optimised away.
This patch adds suitable memory constraints to the atomic operations on ARM
to ensure that the compiler is informed of the correct data hazards. We have
to use the "Qo" constraints to avoid hitting the GCC anomaly described at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44492 , where the compiler
makes assumptions about the writeback in the addressing mode used by the
inline assembly. These constraints forbid the use of auto{inc,dec} addressing
modes, so it doesn't matter if we don't use the operand exactly once.
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h
index 4f0f282..99ab659 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h
@@ -40,12 +40,12 @@ static inline void atomic_add(int i, atomic_t *v)
int result;
__asm__ __volatile__("@ atomic_add\n"
-"1: ldrex %0, [%2]\n"
-" add %0, %0, %3\n"
-" strex %1, %0, [%2]\n"
+"1: ldrex %0, [%3]\n"
+" add %0, %0, %4\n"
+" strex %1, %0, [%3]\n"
" teq %1, #0\n"
" bne 1b"
- : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (tmp)
+ : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (tmp), "+Qo" (v->counter)
: "r" (&v->counter), "Ir" (i)
: "cc");
}
@@ -58,12 +58,12 @@ static inline int atomic_add_return(int i, atomic_t *v)
smp_mb();
__asm__ __volatile__("@ atomic_add_return\n"
-"1: ldrex %0, [%2]\n"
-" add %0, %0, %3\n"
-" strex %1, %0, [%2]\n"
+"1: ldrex %0, [%3]\n"
+" add %0, %0, %4\n"
+" strex %1, %0, [%3]\n"
" teq %1, #0\n"
" bne 1b"
- : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (tmp)
+ : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (tmp), "+Qo" (v->counter)
: "r" (&v->counter), "Ir" (i)
: "cc");
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@ static inline void atomic_sub(int i, atomic_t *v)
int result;
__asm__ __volatile__("@ atomic_sub\n"
-"1: ldrex %0, [%2]\n"
-" sub %0, %0, %3\n"
-" strex %1, %0, [%2]\n"
+"1: ldrex %0, [%3]\n"
+" sub %0, %0, %4\n"
+" strex %1, %0, [%3]\n"
" teq %1, #0\n"
" bne 1b"
- : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (tmp)
+ : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (tmp), "+Qo" (v->counter)
: "r" (&v->counter), "Ir" (i)
: "cc");
}
@@ -96,12 +96,12 @@ static inline int atomic_sub_return(int i, atomic_t *v)
smp_mb();
__asm__ __volatile__("@ atomic_sub_return\n"
-"1: ldrex %0, [%2]\n"
-" sub %0, %0, %3\n"
-" strex %1, %0, [%2]\n"
+"1: ldrex %0, [%3]\n"
+" sub %0, %0, %4\n"
+" strex %1, %0, [%3]\n"
" teq %1, #0\n"
" bne 1b"
- : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (tmp)
+ : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (tmp), "+Qo" (v->counter)
: "r" (&v->counter), "Ir" (i)
: "cc");
@@ -118,11 +118,11 @@ static inline int atomic_cmpxchg(atomic_t *ptr, int old, int new)
do {
__asm__ __volatile__("@ atomic_cmpxchg\n"
- "ldrex %1, [%2]\n"
+ "ldrex %1, [%3]\n"
"mov %0, #0\n"
- "teq %1, %3\n"
- "strexeq %0, %4, [%2]\n"
- : "=&r" (res), "=&r" (oldval)
+ "teq %1, %4\n"
+ "strexeq %0, %5, [%3]\n"
+ : "=&r" (res), "=&r" (oldval), "+Qo" (ptr->counter)
: "r" (&ptr->counter), "Ir" (old), "r" (new)
: "cc");
} while (res);
@@ -137,12 +137,12 @@ static inline void atomic_clear_mask(unsigned long mask, unsigned long *addr)
unsigned long tmp, tmp2;
__asm__ __volatile__("@ atomic_clear_mask\n"
-"1: ldrex %0, [%2]\n"
-" bic %0, %0, %3\n"
-" strex %1, %0, [%2]\n"
+"1: ldrex %0, [%3]\n"
+" bic %0, %0, %4\n"
+" strex %1, %0, [%3]\n"
" teq %1, #0\n"
" bne 1b"
- : "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (tmp2)
+ : "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (tmp2), "+Qo" (*addr)
: "r" (addr), "Ir" (mask)
: "cc");
}
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static inline u64 atomic64_read(atomic64_t *v)
__asm__ __volatile__("@ atomic64_read\n"
" ldrexd %0, %H0, [%1]"
: "=&r" (result)
- : "r" (&v->counter)
+ : "r" (&v->counter), "Qo" (v->counter)
);
return result;
@@ -260,11 +260,11 @@ static inline void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, u64 i)
u64 tmp;
__asm__ __volatile__("@ atomic64_set\n"
-"1: ldrexd %0, %H0, [%1]\n"
-" strexd %0, %2, %H2, [%1]\n"
+"1: ldrexd %0, %H0, [%2]\n"
+" strexd %0, %3, %H3, [%2]\n"
" teq %0, #0\n"
" bne 1b"
- : "=&r" (tmp)
+ : "=&r" (tmp), "=Qo" (v->counter)
: "r" (&v->counter), "r" (i)
: "cc");
}
@@ -275,13 +275,13 @@ static inline void atomic64_add(u64 i, atomic64_t *v)
unsigned long tmp;
__asm__ __volatile__("@ atomic64_add\n"
-"1: ldrexd %0, %H0, [%2]\n"
-" adds %0, %0, %3\n"
-" adc %H0, %H0, %H3\n"
-" strexd %1, %0, %H0, [%2]\n"
+"1: ldrexd %0, %H0, [%3]\n"
+" adds %0, %0, %4\n"
+" adc %H0, %H0, %H4\n"
+" strexd %1, %0, %H0, [%3]\n"
" teq %1, #0\n"
" bne 1b"
- : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (tmp)
+ : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (tmp), "+Qo" (v->counter)
: "r" (&v->counter), "r" (i)
: "cc");
}
@@ -294,13 +294,13 @@ static inline u64 atomic64_add_return(u64 i, atomic64_t *v)
smp_mb();
__asm__ __volatile__("@ atomic64_add_return\n"
-"1: ldrexd %0, %H0, [%2]\n"
-" adds %0, %0, %3\n"
-" adc %H0, %H0, %H3\n"
-" strexd %1, %0, %H0, [%2]\n"
+"1: ldrexd %0, %H0, [%3]\n"
+" adds %0, %0, %4\n"
+" adc %H0, %H0, %H4\n"
+" strexd %1, %0, %H0, [%3]\n"
" teq %1, #0\n"
" bne 1b"
- : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (tmp)
+ : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (tmp), "+Qo" (v->counter)
: "r" (&v->counter), "r" (i)
: "cc");
@@ -315,13 +315,13 @@ static inline void atomic64_sub(u64 i, atomic64_t *v)
unsigned long tmp;
__asm__ __volatile__("@ atomic64_sub\n"
-"1: ldrexd %0, %H0, [%2]\n"
-" subs %0, %0, %3\n"
-" sbc %H0, %H0, %H3\n"
-" strexd %1, %0, %H0, [%2]\n"
+"1: ldrexd %0, %H0, [%3]\n"
+" subs %0, %0, %4\n"
+" sbc %H0, %H0, %H4\n"
+" strexd %1, %0, %H0, [%3]\n"
" teq %1, #0\n"
" bne 1b"
- : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (tmp)
+ : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (tmp), "+Qo" (v->counter)
: "r" (&v->counter), "r" (i)
: "cc");
}
@@ -334,13 +334,13 @@ static inline u64 atomic64_sub_return(u64 i, atomic64_t *v)
smp_mb();
__asm__ __volatile__("@ atomic64_sub_return\n"
-"1: ldrexd %0, %H0, [%2]\n"
-" subs %0, %0, %3\n"
-" sbc %H0, %H0, %H3\n"
-" strexd %1, %0, %H0, [%2]\n"
+"1: ldrexd %0, %H0, [%3]\n"
+" subs %0, %0, %4\n"
+" sbc %H0, %H0, %H4\n"
+" strexd %1, %0, %H0, [%3]\n"
" teq %1, #0\n"
" bne 1b"
- : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (tmp)
+ : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (tmp), "+Qo" (v->counter)
: "r" (&v->counter), "r" (i)
: "cc");
@@ -359,11 +359,11 @@ static inline u64 atomic64_cmpxchg(atomic64_t *ptr, u64 old, u64 new)
do {
__asm__ __volatile__("@ atomic64_cmpxchg\n"
"mov %0, #0\n"
- "ldrexd %1, %H1, [%2]\n"
- "teq %1, %3\n"
- "teqeq %H1, %H3\n"
- "strexdeq %0, %4, %H4, [%2]"
- : "=&r" (res), "=&r" (oldval)
+ "ldrexd %1, %H1, [%3]\n"
+ "teq %1, %4\n"
+ "teqeq %H1, %H4\n"
+ "strexdeq %0, %5, %H5, [%3]"
+ : "=&r" (res), "=&r" (oldval), "+Qo" (ptr->counter)
: "r" (&ptr->counter), "r" (old), "r" (new)
: "cc");
} while (res);
@@ -381,11 +381,11 @@ static inline u64 atomic64_xchg(atomic64_t *ptr, u64 new)
smp_mb();
__asm__ __volatile__("@ atomic64_xchg\n"
-"1: ldrexd %0, %H0, [%2]\n"
-" strexd %1, %3, %H3, [%2]\n"
+"1: ldrexd %0, %H0, [%3]\n"
+" strexd %1, %4, %H4, [%3]\n"
" teq %1, #0\n"
" bne 1b"
- : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (tmp)
+ : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (tmp), "+Qo" (ptr->counter)
: "r" (&ptr->counter), "r" (new)
: "cc");
@@ -402,16 +402,16 @@ static inline u64 atomic64_dec_if_positive(atomic64_t *v)
smp_mb();
__asm__ __volatile__("@ atomic64_dec_if_positive\n"
-"1: ldrexd %0, %H0, [%2]\n"
+"1: ldrexd %0, %H0, [%3]\n"
" subs %0, %0, #1\n"
" sbc %H0, %H0, #0\n"
" teq %H0, #0\n"
" bmi 2f\n"
-" strexd %1, %0, %H0, [%2]\n"
+" strexd %1, %0, %H0, [%3]\n"
" teq %1, #0\n"
" bne 1b\n"
"2:"
- : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (tmp)
+ : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (tmp), "+Qo" (v->counter)
: "r" (&v->counter)
: "cc");
@@ -429,18 +429,18 @@ static inline int atomic64_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, u64 a, u64 u)
smp_mb();
__asm__ __volatile__("@ atomic64_add_unless\n"
-"1: ldrexd %0, %H0, [%3]\n"
-" teq %0, %4\n"
-" teqeq %H0, %H4\n"
+"1: ldrexd %0, %H0, [%4]\n"
+" teq %0, %5\n"
+" teqeq %H0, %H5\n"
" moveq %1, #0\n"
" beq 2f\n"
-" adds %0, %0, %5\n"
-" adc %H0, %H0, %H5\n"
-" strexd %2, %0, %H0, [%3]\n"
+" adds %0, %0, %6\n"
+" adc %H0, %H0, %H6\n"
+" strexd %2, %0, %H0, [%4]\n"
" teq %2, #0\n"
" bne 1b\n"
"2:"
- : "=&r" (val), "+r" (ret), "=&r" (tmp)
+ : "=&r" (val), "+r" (ret), "=&r" (tmp), "+Qo" (v->counter)
: "r" (&v->counter), "r" (u), "r" (a)
: "cc");
--
1.6.3.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-30 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-30 14:04 [PATCH 0/4] Fix atomic operations so that atomic64_test passes on ARM [V2] Will Deacon
2010-06-30 14:04 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: atomic ops: fix register constraints for atomic64_add_unless Will Deacon
2010-06-30 14:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: atomic ops: reduce critical region in atomic64_cmpxchg Will Deacon
2010-06-30 14:04 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2010-06-30 14:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: atomic64_test: add ARM as supported architecture Will Deacon
2010-07-08 5:50 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-07-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: atomic ops: add memory constraints to inline asm Will Deacon
2010-07-08 5:49 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-07-08 9:36 ` Will Deacon
[not found] ` <004b01cb1e81$0b745960$225d0c20$%deacon@arm.com>
2010-07-08 12:42 ` Nicolas Pitre
[not found] ` <004101cb1df3$5825ecd0$0871c670$%deacon@arm.com>
2010-07-08 5:58 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-07-08 10:03 ` Will Deacon
2010-07-08 4:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: atomic ops: reduce critical region in atomic64_cmpxchg Nicolas Pitre
2010-07-08 9:43 ` Will Deacon
2010-07-08 4:37 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: atomic ops: fix register constraints for atomic64_add_unless Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1277906688-12065-4-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).