From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas) Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:21:05 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm: show_regs dump stack when ARM_UNWIND enable In-Reply-To: References: <20100720152431.GA17092@localhost.localdomain> <1279640276.10002.35.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: <1279704065.17464.1.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 16:54 +0100, ye janboe wrote: > Yes. both are same. > > Is it ok to remove backtrace.S if ARM_UNWIND is enable? I think so, as long as you provide some macro or static inline function for __backtrace and c_backtrace (if they are called at all). -- Catalin