From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: benh@kernel.crashing.org (Benjamin Herrenschmidt) Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:03:02 +1000 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] arm: msm: Add System MMU support. In-Reply-To: <20100802074812.GM24084@amd.com> References: <20100729123512Y.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <201007291026.55928.arnd@arndb.de> <1280546124.1902.30.camel@pasglop> <20100802074812.GM24084@amd.com> Message-ID: <1280736182.1902.55.camel@pasglop> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 09:48 +0200, Roedel, Joerg wrote: > > Hrm, indeed I just noticed that. Pretty gross... it should definitly > be > > renamed, is will caused endless confusion with unrelated iommu.h and > > iommu_* interfaces which represent something different. > > The first direction to go should be trying to unify all the different > iommu* interfaces into the iommu-api. The generic api will definitly > need to be extended for that, but since it is an in-kernel interface > thats no problem. Well, I suppose I'm the de-facto candidate to take care of the powerpc side then :-) I don't have the bandwidth right now, but I'll try to have a look when time permits. Cheers, Ben.