From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dwmw2@infradead.org (David Woodhouse)
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 22:28:58 +0100
Subject: Query: Patches break with Microsoft exchange server.
In-Reply-To: <201008092115.25992.mihai.dontu@gmail.com>
References: <4C5F9B25.8080401@st.com>
	<201008091735.11105.mihai.dontu@gmail.com> <4C6040FC.2020702@gmail.com>
	<201008092115.25992.mihai.dontu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1281389338.7143.32.camel@localhost>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 21:15 +0300, Mihai Don?u wrote:
> 
> Wait. I don't think we're on the same page here. I'm talking about message 
> signing (which does not require the receiving end to have any key - it's the 
> same plain text e-mail with a blob after it) while you refer to actually 
> encrypting the message. Mm? Or am I being extremely slow today? :-) 

Only when you assume that Exchange would pass signed messages without
corrupting them. It really is that broken.

-- 
dwmw2