From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: peterz@infradead.org (Peter Zijlstra) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:05:32 +0200 Subject: [PATCH/RFCv4 0/6] The Contiguous Memory Allocator framework In-Reply-To: References: <1282310110.2605.976.camel@laptop> <20100825155814.25c783c7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100825173125.0855a6b0@bike.lwn.net> <1282810811.1975.246.camel@laptop> <1282817160.1975.476.camel@laptop> Message-ID: <1282820732.1975.606.camel@laptop> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Even more offtopic ;-) On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:21 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > I agree highmem isn't a gorgeous. But my desktop isn't real machine? > Important thing is that we already have a highmem and many guys > include you(kmap stacking patch :))try to improve highmem problems. :) I have exactly 0 machines in daily use that use highmem, I had to test that kmap stuff in a 32bit qemu. Sadly some hardware folks still think its a sane thing to do, like ARM announcing 40bit PAE, I mean really?! At least AMD announced a 64bit tiny-chip and hopefully Intel Atom will soon be all 64bit too (please?!).