* [PATCH] at91: fix arch_gettimeoffset fallout
@ 2010-09-17 13:31 Peter Korsgaard
2010-09-17 17:41 ` john stultz
2010-09-18 1:08 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Korsgaard @ 2010-09-17 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
5cfc8ee0bb51 (ARM: convert arm to arch_gettimeoffset()) marked all of
at91 AND at91x40 as needing ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET, and hence no high
res timer support / accurate clock_gettime() - But only at91x40 needs it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@barco.com>
---
arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index 553b7cf..a1907b2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -271,7 +271,6 @@ config ARCH_AT91
bool "Atmel AT91"
select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
select HAVE_CLK
- select ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET
help
This enables support for systems based on the Atmel AT91RM9200,
AT91SAM9 and AT91CAP9 processors.
--
1.7.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] at91: fix arch_gettimeoffset fallout
2010-09-17 13:31 [PATCH] at91: fix arch_gettimeoffset fallout Peter Korsgaard
@ 2010-09-17 17:41 ` john stultz
2010-09-18 13:06 ` Peter Korsgaard
2010-09-18 1:08 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: john stultz @ 2010-09-17 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 15:31 +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> 5cfc8ee0bb51 (ARM: convert arm to arch_gettimeoffset()) marked all of
> at91 AND at91x40 as needing ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET, and hence no high
> res timer support / accurate clock_gettime() - But only at91x40 needs it.
Huh, sorry I missed that subtlety! Thanks for hunting this down!
Acked-by: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@barco.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 -
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index 553b7cf..a1907b2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -271,7 +271,6 @@ config ARCH_AT91
> bool "Atmel AT91"
> select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
> select HAVE_CLK
> - select ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET
> help
> This enables support for systems based on the Atmel AT91RM9200,
> AT91SAM9 and AT91CAP9 processors.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] at91: fix arch_gettimeoffset fallout
2010-09-17 17:41 ` john stultz
@ 2010-09-18 13:06 ` Peter Korsgaard
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Korsgaard @ 2010-09-18 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
>>>>> "john" == john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> writes:
john> On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 15:31 +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>> 5cfc8ee0bb51 (ARM: convert arm to arch_gettimeoffset()) marked all of
>> at91 AND at91x40 as needing ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET, and hence no high
>> res timer support / accurate clock_gettime() - But only at91x40 needs it.
john> Huh, sorry I missed that subtlety! Thanks for hunting this down!
No problem - Thanks for cleaning up the timer handling in the first
place.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] at91: fix arch_gettimeoffset fallout
2010-09-17 13:31 [PATCH] at91: fix arch_gettimeoffset fallout Peter Korsgaard
2010-09-17 17:41 ` john stultz
@ 2010-09-18 1:08 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-18 19:01 ` Peter Korsgaard
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD @ 2010-09-18 1:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 15:31 Fri 17 Sep , Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> 5cfc8ee0bb51 (ARM: convert arm to arch_gettimeoffset()) marked all of
> at91 AND at91x40 as needing ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET, and hence no high
> res timer support / accurate clock_gettime() - But only at91x40 needs it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@barco.com>
Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Best Regards,
J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] at91: fix arch_gettimeoffset fallout
2010-09-18 1:08 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
@ 2010-09-18 19:01 ` Peter Korsgaard
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Korsgaard @ 2010-09-18 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
>>>>> "Jean-Christophe" == Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> writes:
Hi,
>> 5cfc8ee0bb51 (ARM: convert arm to arch_gettimeoffset()) marked all of
>> at91 AND at91x40 as needing ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET, and hence no high
>> res timer support / accurate clock_gettime() - But only at91x40 needs it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@barco.com>
Jean-Christophe> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
<plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Thanks, submitted to rmk's patch tracker as 6400 with those two
acked-by's and a a cc to stable@
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-18 19:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-17 13:31 [PATCH] at91: fix arch_gettimeoffset fallout Peter Korsgaard
2010-09-17 17:41 ` john stultz
2010-09-18 13:06 ` Peter Korsgaard
2010-09-18 1:08 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2010-09-18 19:01 ` Peter Korsgaard
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).