From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] mmc: sdhci: introduce private get_ro
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:08:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1285790884-3516-4-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1285790884-3516-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Some controllers handle their write-protection differently. Introduce a
callback to be able to handle it, ensuring the same locking takes place
for it.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 11 +++++++----
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 96c7f60..129958e 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -1229,14 +1229,17 @@ static int sdhci_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
if (host->flags & SDHCI_DEVICE_DEAD)
present = 0;
+ else if (host->ops->get_ro)
+ present = host->ops->get_ro(host);
else
- present = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE);
+ present = !(sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE)
+ & SDHCI_WRITE_PROTECT);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
- if (host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_INVERTED_WRITE_PROTECT)
- return !!(present & SDHCI_WRITE_PROTECT);
- return !(present & SDHCI_WRITE_PROTECT);
+ /* This quirk needs to be replaced by a callback-function later */
+ return host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_INVERTED_WRITE_PROTECT ?
+ !present : present;
}
static void sdhci_enable_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc, int enable)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
index 112543a..66f83f4 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
@@ -336,6 +336,7 @@ struct sdhci_ops {
unsigned int (*get_max_clock)(struct sdhci_host *host);
unsigned int (*get_min_clock)(struct sdhci_host *host);
unsigned int (*get_timeout_clock)(struct sdhci_host *host);
+ unsigned int (*get_ro)(struct sdhci_host *host);
};
#ifdef CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_IO_ACCESSORS
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-29 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-29 20:07 [PATCH V3 0/6] SD/MMC-driver for MX35/51 (and improvements to SDHCI) Wolfram Sang
2010-09-29 20:07 ` [PATCH 1/6] mmc: sdhci-pltfm: Add structure for host-specific data Wolfram Sang
2010-09-29 21:24 ` Richard Röjfors
2010-09-30 8:16 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-09-30 9:54 ` Richard Röjfors
2010-09-30 10:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-09-30 11:09 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-09-29 20:08 ` [PATCH 2/6] mmc: sdhci-pltfm: move .h-file into apropriate subdir Wolfram Sang
2010-09-29 20:08 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2010-09-29 20:08 ` [PATCH 4/6] mmc: sdhci_pltfm: pass more data on custom init-call Wolfram Sang
2010-09-30 8:31 ` Lothar Waßmann
2010-09-30 9:42 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-10-11 11:07 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-09-29 20:08 ` [PATCH 5/6] mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: factor out common stuff Wolfram Sang
2010-09-29 20:08 ` [PATCH 6/6] mmc: sdhci-pltfm: add pltfm-driver for imx35/51 Wolfram Sang
2010-09-29 20:14 ` Chris Ball
2010-10-02 15:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] mach-cpuimx35: remove unecessary tsc2007 functions + style cleanup Eric Bénard
2010-10-02 15:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] eukrea_mbimxsd for cpuimx35: add CAN & SDCard support Eric Bénard
2010-10-08 13:43 ` imx-for-2.6.37 broken [Was: [PATCH 2/4] eukrea_mbimxsd for cpuimx35: add CAN & SDCard support] Uwe Kleine-König
2010-10-02 15:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] i.mx25: add esdhc support Eric Bénard
2010-10-02 15:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] eukrea_mbimxsd for cpuimx25: add CAN & SDCard support Eric Bénard
2010-10-02 15:17 ` [PATCH V3 0/6] SD/MMC-driver for MX35/51 (and improvements to SDHCI) Eric Bénard
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-10-11 14:21 [PATCH 0/6] SD/MMC driver for MX25/35/51 Wolfram Sang
2010-10-11 14:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] mmc: sdhci: introduce private get_ro Wolfram Sang
2010-10-15 10:20 [PATCH V5 0/6] SD/MMC driver for MX25/35/51 Wolfram Sang
2010-10-15 10:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] mmc: sdhci: introduce private get_ro Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1285790884-3516-4-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).