From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lrg@slimlogic.co.uk (Liam Girdwood) Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 11:09:49 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v3 4/5] mfd: regulator: max8998: voltages and GPIOs defined at platform data structure In-Reply-To: <20101004084646.4de3714d@lmajewski.digital.local> References: <1285590747-32404-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1285590747-32404-5-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <20100927184336.GK2560@sortiz-mobl> <1286026413.3125.27.camel@odin> <20101004084646.4de3714d@lmajewski.digital.local> Message-ID: <1286186989.3148.19.camel@odin> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 08:46 +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > On Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:33:33 +0100 > Liam Girdwood wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 20:43 +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > > > Hi Lukasz, > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 02:32:26PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski > > > > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park > > > Fine with me: > > > Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz > > > > > > > Lukasz, this is not applying against the regulator next tree. > > Can you redo and add Mark and Samuels Acks. > > > > Thanks > > > > Liam > > Hi Liam, > > I've fetched the newest voltage-2.6/for-next and merge it with newest > mfd-2.6/for next. After that all patches are applying and kernel is > building without errors. > > The problem with this patch series is that it "touches" two > repositories: voltage-2.6 and mfd-2.6. > > I'm a bit confused how such situation should be resolved, since it > involves two separate repositories (and two maintainers to cooperate). > You should only base your patches on one tree for upstreaming and since this series mostly touches regulator it's best base against the regulator tree. Liam -- Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer. http://www.slimlogic.co.uk