From: dwalker@codeaurora.org (Daniel Walker)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [ARM] Translate delay.S into (mostly) C
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:35:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1286393743.22265.129.camel@m0nster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CACC053.2090509@codeaurora.org>
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 11:30 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Is there some way to force GCC to do what I want (interleave the
> functions)? It seems happy to inline them and then optimize the
> register
> usage and instruction ordering. Perhaps that is OK though and we're
> wasting our time trying to be conservative in code size.
Is it possible to do all this in assembly ? Can't you have the default
implementation using this assembly with different function names, then
just set the assembly function names in C code someplace?
Daniel
--
Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-06 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-28 3:33 [PATCH 0/3] Fixing udelay() on SMP (and non-SMP too) Stephen Boyd
2010-09-28 3:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] [ARM] Translate delay.S into (mostly) C Stephen Boyd
2010-10-05 17:22 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-06 3:36 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-10-06 13:38 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-06 14:26 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-10-06 18:30 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-10-06 19:35 ` Daniel Walker [this message]
2010-10-06 20:05 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-10-08 0:11 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-10-08 1:12 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-10-06 20:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-09-28 3:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] [ARM] Allow machines to override __delay() Stephen Boyd
2010-10-05 17:29 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-06 3:36 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-09-28 3:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] [ARM] Implement a timer based __delay() loop Stephen Boyd
2010-10-05 17:38 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-06 3:36 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-10-06 13:44 ` Daniel Walker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-07 18:23 [PATCH 0/3] Fixing udelay() on SMP (and non-SMP too) Stephen Boyd
2010-09-07 18:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] [ARM] Translate delay.S into (mostly) C Stephen Boyd
2010-08-19 2:24 [PATCH 0/3] Fixing udelay() on SMP (and non-SMP too) Stephen Boyd
2010-08-19 2:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] [ARM] Translate delay.S into (mostly) C Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1286393743.22265.129.camel@m0nster \
--to=dwalker@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).