From: peterz@infradead.org (Peter Zijlstra)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [BUG] 2.6.37-rc3 massive interactivity regression on ARM
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:16:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291936593.13513.3.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim+v21RpWobdw6exEbazDJwm4JjemPVB2+3PuRJ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 14:21 -0800, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote:
> This should mostly work. There would be a small window there on
> rq->clock=sched_clock_cpu() and system_vtime doing sched_clock_cpu()
> and also the overhead of doing this everytime when this going
> backwards may happen rarely.
Right, so something like the below removes that tiny race by re-using
rq->clock as now. It also removes some overhead by removing the IRQ
fudging (we already know IRQs are disabled).
It does have a few extra branches (2 afaict) than your monotonicity path
had, but it seems to me this approach is slightly more accurate.
---
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1813,19 +1813,10 @@ void disable_sched_clock_irqtime(void)
sched_clock_irqtime = 0;
}
-void account_system_vtime(struct task_struct *curr)
+static void __account_system_vtime(int cpu, u64 now)
{
- unsigned long flags;
- int cpu;
- u64 now, delta;
+ s64 delta;
- if (!sched_clock_irqtime)
- return;
-
- local_irq_save(flags);
-
- cpu = smp_processor_id();
- now = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
delta = now - per_cpu(irq_start_time, cpu);
per_cpu(irq_start_time, cpu) = now;
/*
@@ -1836,16 +1827,36 @@ void account_system_vtime(struct task_st
*/
if (hardirq_count())
per_cpu(cpu_hardirq_time, cpu) += delta;
- else if (in_serving_softirq() && !(curr->flags & PF_KSOFTIRQD))
+ else if (in_serving_softirq() && !(current->flags & PF_KSOFTIRQD))
per_cpu(cpu_softirq_time, cpu) += delta;
+}
+
+void account_system_vtime(struct task_struct *curr)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ u64 now;
+ int cpu;
+
+ if (!sched_clock_irqtime)
+ return;
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+
+ cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ now = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
+ __account_system_vtime(cpu, now);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(account_system_vtime);
-static u64 irq_time_cpu(int cpu)
+static u64 irq_time_cpu(struct rq *rq)
{
- account_system_vtime(current);
+ int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
+
+ if (sched_clock_irqtime)
+ __account_system_vtime(cpu, rq->clock);
+
return per_cpu(cpu_softirq_time, cpu) + per_cpu(cpu_hardirq_time, cpu);
}
@@ -1853,7 +1864,7 @@ static void update_rq_clock_task(struct
{
s64 irq_delta;
- irq_delta = irq_time_cpu(cpu_of(rq)) - rq->prev_irq_time;
+ irq_delta = irq_time_cpu(rq) - rq->prev_irq_time;
rq->prev_irq_time += irq_delta;
delta -= irq_delta;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-09 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-27 15:16 [BUG] 2.6.37-rc3 massive interactivity regression on ARM Mikael Pettersson
2010-12-05 12:32 ` Mikael Pettersson
2010-12-05 13:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-05 14:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-05 16:07 ` Mikael Pettersson
2010-12-05 16:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-08 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 12:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-08 14:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 14:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-08 14:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 15:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-08 15:43 ` Linus Walleij
2010-12-08 20:42 ` john stultz
2010-12-08 23:31 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-09 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-09 17:43 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-09 17:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-09 18:11 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-09 18:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-09 22:21 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-09 23:16 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-12-09 23:35 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-12-10 10:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 13:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 13:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 16:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-10 16:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 17:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-10 17:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 18:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-10 18:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-10 18:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 19:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-10 20:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 20:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-10 20:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 20:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-10 20:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-10 21:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-10 21:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-10 21:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-10 17:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-10 18:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 18:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 19:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-10 19:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 19:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-13 14:33 ` Jack Daniel
2010-12-06 21:29 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1291936593.13513.3.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).