From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] hvc_dcc: Simplify assembly for v6 and v7 ARM
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:08:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1292875718-7980-4-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1292875718-7980-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
The inline assembly differences for v6 vs. v7 in the hvc_dcc
driver are purely optimizations. On a v7 processor, an mrc with
the pc sets the condition codes to the 28-31 bits of the register
being read. It just so happens that the TX/RX full bits the DCC
driver is testing for are high enough in the register to be put
into the condition codes. On a v6 processor, this "feature" isn't
implemented and thus we have to do the usual read, mask, test
operations to check for TX/RX full.
Since we already test the RX/TX full bits before calling
__dcc_getchar() and __dcc_putchar() we don't actually need to do
anything special for v7 over v6. The only difference is in
hvc_dcc_get_chars(). We would test RX full, poll RX full, and
then read a character from the buffer, whereas now we will test
RX full, read a character from the buffer, and then test RX full
again for the second iteration of the loop. It doesn't seem
possible for the buffer to go from full to empty between testing
the RX full and reading a character. Therefore, replace the v7
versions with the v6 versions and everything works the same.
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/char/hvc_dcc.c | 24 ------------------------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/hvc_dcc.c b/drivers/char/hvc_dcc.c
index ad23cc8..435f6fa 100644
--- a/drivers/char/hvc_dcc.c
+++ b/drivers/char/hvc_dcc.c
@@ -40,19 +40,6 @@ static inline u32 __dcc_getstatus(void)
}
-#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_V7)
-static inline char __dcc_getchar(void)
-{
- char __c;
-
- asm volatile("get_wait: mrc p14, 0, pc, c0, c1, 0 \n\
- bne get_wait \n\
- mrc p14, 0, %0, c0, c5, 0 @ read comms data reg"
- : "=r" (__c) : : "cc");
-
- return __c;
-}
-#else
static inline char __dcc_getchar(void)
{
char __c;
@@ -62,24 +49,13 @@ static inline char __dcc_getchar(void)
return __c;
}
-#endif
-#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_V7)
-static inline void __dcc_putchar(char c)
-{
- asm volatile("put_wait: mrc p14, 0, pc, c0, c1, 0 \n\
- bcs put_wait \n\
- mcr p14, 0, %0, c0, c5, 0 "
- : : "r" (c) : "cc");
-}
-#else
static inline void __dcc_putchar(char c)
{
asm volatile("mcr p14, 0, %0, c0, c5, 0 @ write a char"
: /* no output register */
: "r" (c));
}
-#endif
static int hvc_dcc_put_chars(uint32_t vt, const char *buf, int count)
{
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-20 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20101201192856.GA731@suse.de>
2010-12-18 5:16 ` [PATCH] hvc_dcc: Simplify assembly for v6 and v7 ARM Stephen Boyd
2010-12-20 17:51 ` Daniel Walker
2010-12-20 18:39 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-12-20 18:46 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-12-20 20:08 ` [PATCH 0/3] hvc_dcc cleanups and fixes Stephen Boyd
2010-12-20 20:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] hvc_dcc: Fix bad code generation by marking assembly volatile Stephen Boyd
2010-12-20 21:39 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-02 9:00 ` Pavel Machek
2011-01-02 18:49 ` David Brown
2011-01-03 5:50 ` Pavel Machek
2011-01-04 18:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-12-20 21:49 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2010-12-20 21:52 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-12-20 22:10 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-12-20 20:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] hvc_dcc: Simplify put_chars()/get_chars() loops Stephen Boyd
2010-12-20 20:08 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2010-12-20 21:44 ` [PATCH 3/3] hvc_dcc: Simplify assembly for v6 and v7 ARM Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-04 18:52 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-06 1:49 ` [PATCH 0/3] hvc_dcc cleanups and fixes Stephen Boyd
2011-01-06 3:20 ` Greg KH
2011-02-03 22:17 ` Greg KH
2011-02-03 23:19 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-03 23:30 ` Greg KH
2011-02-03 23:48 ` [PATCHv2 " Stephen Boyd
2011-02-03 23:48 ` [PATCHv2 1/3] hvc_dcc: Fix bad code generation by marking assembly volatile Stephen Boyd
2011-02-03 23:48 ` [PATCHv2 2/3] hvc_dcc: Simplify put_chars()/get_chars() loops Stephen Boyd
2011-02-03 23:48 ` [PATCHv2 3/3] hvc_dcc: Simplify assembly for v6 and v7 ARM Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1292875718-7980-4-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).