From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com (Trond Myklebust) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:29:27 -0500 Subject: still nfs problems [Was: Linux 2.6.37-rc8] In-Reply-To: <20110110192552.GG24920@pengutronix.de> References: <1294426405.2929.23.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20110107190229.GX31708@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1294427467.4895.66.camel@mulgrave.site> <1294505384.4181.14.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <1294528551.4181.19.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20110110105019.GC24920@pengutronix.de> <1294676734.3349.10.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <4D2B3D03.8050504@pengutronix.de> <1294680035.3349.19.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20110110192552.GG24920@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <1294687767.3349.28.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 20:25 +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > Hello Trond, > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:20:35PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 18:08 +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > > > On 01/10/2011 05:25 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 11:50 +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > > > >> Hi Trond, > > > >> > > > >> On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 06:15:51PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> It would be great if you could add a "8<" in the line above next time. > > > >> Then git-am -c does the right thing (at least I think so). > > > > > > > > Sorry. I wasn't aware of that particular idiom. So something like > > > > > > > > 8<------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > From: Trond Myklebust > > > > Subject: ..... > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > From "man git-mailinfo": > > > "A line that mainly consists of scissors (either ">8" or "8<") and > > > perforation (dash "-")" > > > > > > BTW: > > > Is this patch a candidate for stable? > > > > Yes. I'm planning on sending it to the stable list after Linus merges it > > into mainline. > So there is another idiom for you: just put > > Cc: stable at kernel.org > > in the S-o-b block and Greg will pick it off "automatically". (Just in > case you don't know, and if you do, maybe someone else learned > something.) I usually do this, but there is a slight problem with that approach: Greg gets to do all the work of figuring out to which stable kernels this particular patch applies. In this case, since we're only talking about the 2.6.37 kernel, I prefer to use the mailing lists. Cheers Trond -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer NetApp Trond.Myklebust at netapp.com www.netapp.com