From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com (James Bottomley) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 22:31:49 +0300 Subject: still nfs problems [Was: Linux 2.6.37-rc8] In-Reply-To: <1294687767.3349.28.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> References: <1294426405.2929.23.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20110107190229.GX31708@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1294427467.4895.66.camel@mulgrave.site> <1294505384.4181.14.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <1294528551.4181.19.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20110110105019.GC24920@pengutronix.de> <1294676734.3349.10.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <4D2B3D03.8050504@pengutronix.de> <1294680035.3349.19.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20110110192552.GG24920@pengutronix.de> <1294687767.3349.28.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> Message-ID: <1294687909.6706.885.camel@mulgrave.site> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 14:29 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote: > I usually do this, but there is a slight problem with that approach: > Greg gets to do all the work of figuring out to which stable kernels > this particular patch applies. In this case, since we're only talking > about the 2.6.37 kernel, I prefer to use the mailing lists. So the non-standard, but accepted way of doing this is Cc: Stable Tree [2.6.37] James