From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dwmw2@infradead.org (David Woodhouse) Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 23:58:47 +1000 Subject: [PATCH 0/7] Nexus One Support In-Reply-To: References: <1295555565-21563-1-git-send-email-dwalker@codeaurora.org> <1295571359.9236.53.camel@m0nster> <1295574085.4096.6.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1295575123.9236.54.camel@m0nster> <1295576730.4096.24.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1295624801.19880.13.camel@m0nster> <20110121094827.41818a55@jbarnes-desktop> <20110121095658.1ab623fe@jbarnes-desktop> <1295632828.19880.22.camel@m0nster> <20110121100441.06a94482@jbarnes-desktop> <1295633882.19880.31.camel@m0nster> <1295642995.19880.42.camel@m0nster> <20110121130106.5f30908d@jbarnes-desktop> <1295645218.22882.2.camel@m0nster> Message-ID: <1295704727.7115.35.camel@macbook.infradead.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 13:42 -0800, Dima Zavin wrote: > My main point is that the authorship of this code is VERY easy to > ascertain. It is not like a lot of other vendor code that gets thrown > over the wall as a tarball. We really do our best to follow the right > practices, give the right credits, create legible well separated > commits, etc. So your code was already submitted to Linus in a form that he'll accept, and Daniel is just completely wasting his time? -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse at intel.com Intel Corporation