From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] msm: scm: Mark inline asm as volatile
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 10:30:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1298975439.7828.2.camel@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8yalj112x98.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com>
Hi David,
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 17:38 +0000, David Brown wrote:
> Per the gcc manual:
>
> If your assembler instructions access memory in an unpredictable
> fashion, add `memory' to the list of clobbered registers. This will
> cause GCC to not keep memory values cached in registers across the
> assembler instruction and not optimize stores or loads to that
> memory. You will also want to add the `volatile' keyword if the
> memory affected is not listed in the inputs or outputs of the `asm',
> as the `memory' clobber does not count as a side-effect of the `asm'.
> If you know how large the accessed memory is, you can add it as input
> or output but if this is not known, you should add `memory'. As an
> example, if you access ten bytes of a string, you can use a memory
> input like:
>
Right, so if you neglected to check the output from the smc block then
it would be a candidate for removal even with a memory clobber. Now I
see why you want a volatile in there!
For what it's worth:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-01 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-24 18:44 [PATCH 0/4] SCM fixes and updates Stephen Boyd
2011-02-24 18:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] msm: scm: Mark inline asm as volatile Stephen Boyd
2011-02-25 11:56 ` Will Deacon
2011-02-25 19:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-26 18:12 ` David Brown
2011-02-26 19:43 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-27 17:41 ` David Brown
2011-02-28 2:21 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-27 11:10 ` Will Deacon
2011-02-27 17:38 ` David Brown
2011-03-01 10:30 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2011-02-24 18:44 ` [PATCH 2/4] msm: scm: Fix improper register assignment Stephen Boyd
2011-02-25 13:23 ` Will Deacon
2011-02-25 19:22 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-26 5:09 ` Saravana Kannan
2011-02-26 8:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-26 17:58 ` David Brown
2011-02-26 20:04 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-03-01 10:37 ` Will Deacon
2011-03-01 21:29 ` Saravana Kannan
2011-03-02 0:02 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-03-01 13:54 ` Will Deacon
2011-02-24 18:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] msm: scm: Check for interruption immediately Stephen Boyd
2011-02-24 18:44 ` [PATCH 4/4] msm: scm: Get cacheline size from CTR Stephen Boyd
2011-02-24 19:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-24 19:44 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-24 19:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-03-01 4:21 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-24 19:32 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-02-24 19:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-02-24 19:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-03-09 19:29 ` [PATCH 0/4] SCM fixes and updates Stephen Boyd
2011-03-10 20:06 ` David Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1298975439.7828.2.camel@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).