From: giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com (Giulio Benetti)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [v2] drm/sun4i: add lvds mode_valid function
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 16:02:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <129dfeb0-0962-608d-370e-277a3acce7ca@micronovasrl.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGb2v64dqPoJkJDuMWp66HYXvZ3RJkrRz+2-CUVEcEG1k7UTsw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi everybody,
Il 19/04/2018 15:36, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 9:34 PM, Ond?ej Jirman
> <doudahwezomiechahtah@xff.cz> wrote:
>> Hello Giulio,
>>
>> this patch breaks LVDS output on A83T. Without it, modesetting works,
>> with it there's no output.
>>
>> Some more info below...
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:20:19PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
>>> mode_valid function is missing for lvds.
>>>
>>> Add it making it pointed by encoder helper functions.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c
>>> index be3f14d..bffff4c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c
>>> @@ -94,9 +94,64 @@ static void sun4i_lvds_encoder_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static enum drm_mode_status sun4i_lvds_encoder_mode_valid(struct drm_encoder *crtc,
>>> + const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
>>> +{
>>> + struct sun4i_lvds *lvds = drm_encoder_to_sun4i_lvds(crtc);
>>> + struct sun4i_tcon *tcon = lvds->tcon;
>>> + u32 hsync = mode->hsync_end - mode->hsync_start;
>>> + u32 vsync = mode->vsync_end - mode->vsync_start;
>>> + unsigned long rate = mode->clock * 1000;
>>> + long rounded_rate;
>>> +
>>> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Validating modes...\n");
>>> +
>>> + if (hsync < 1)
>>> + return MODE_HSYNC_NARROW;
>>> +
>>> + if (hsync > 0x3ff)
>>> + return MODE_HSYNC_WIDE;
>>> +
>>> + if ((mode->hdisplay < 1) || (mode->htotal < 1))
>>> + return MODE_H_ILLEGAL;
>>> +
>>> + if ((mode->hdisplay > 0x7ff) || (mode->htotal > 0xfff))
>>> + return MODE_BAD_HVALUE;
>>> +
>>> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Horizontal parameters OK\n");
>>> +
>>> + if (vsync < 1)
>>> + return MODE_VSYNC_NARROW;
>>> +
>>> + if (vsync > 0x3ff)
>>> + return MODE_VSYNC_WIDE;
>>> +
>>> + if ((mode->vdisplay < 1) || (mode->vtotal < 1))
>>> + return MODE_V_ILLEGAL;
>>> +
>>> + if ((mode->vdisplay > 0x7ff) || (mode->vtotal > 0xfff))
>>> + return MODE_BAD_VVALUE;
>>> +
>>> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Vertical parameters OK\n");
>>> +
>>> + tcon->dclk_min_div = 7;
>>> + tcon->dclk_max_div = 7;
>>
>> Why would validation function change any state anywhere?
>>
>>> + rounded_rate = clk_round_rate(tcon->dclk, rate);
>>
>> The issue is here, on A83T TBS A711 tablet, I get...
>>
>> sun4i-tcon 1c0c000.lcd-controller: XXX: hsync=20 hdisplay=1024 htotal=1384
>> vsync=5 vdisplay=600 vtotal=640 rate=52000000 rounded_rate=51857142
>>
>>> + if (rounded_rate < rate)
>>> + return MODE_CLOCK_LOW;
>>> +
>>> + if (rounded_rate > rate)
>>> + return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
>>
>> ... while the previous conditions require an exact match for some reason.
>>
>> But HW works fine without an exact rate match. Why is exact match required here?
>
> This thread might provide some more info, though we could never get an
> agreement.
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9446385/
Thanks for pointing that Thread ChenYu.
So the only chance is to trim frequency according to encoder capabilities.
I agree to block when encoder can't provide frequency specified,
otherwise you could drive you panel at the near the lowest(highest)
frequency and get out of limits for a few without knowing it.
Best regards
--
Giulio Benetti
CTO
MICRONOVA SRL
Sede: Via A. Niedda 3 - 35010 Vigonza (PD)
Tel. 049/8931563 - Fax 049/8931346
Cod.Fiscale - P.IVA 02663420285
Capitale Sociale ? 26.000 i.v.
Iscritta al Reg. Imprese di Padova N. 02663420285
Numero R.E.A. 258642
>
> ChenYu
>
>>
>> thank you,
>> Ondrej
>>
>>> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Clock rate OK\n");
>>> +
>>> + return MODE_OK;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static const struct drm_encoder_helper_funcs sun4i_lvds_enc_helper_funcs = {
>>> .disable = sun4i_lvds_encoder_disable,
>>> .enable = sun4i_lvds_encoder_enable,
>>> + .mode_valid = sun4i_lvds_encoder_mode_valid,
>>> };
>>>
>>> static const struct drm_encoder_funcs sun4i_lvds_enc_funcs = {
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-19 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-13 11:20 [PATCH v2] drm/sun4i: add lvds mode_valid function Giulio Benetti
2018-03-14 9:30 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-04-19 13:34 ` [v2] " Ondřej Jirman
2018-04-19 13:36 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2018-04-19 14:02 ` Giulio Benetti [this message]
2018-04-20 13:10 ` Ondřej Jirman
2018-04-20 20:39 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=129dfeb0-0962-608d-370e-277a3acce7ca@micronovasrl.com \
--to=giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox