From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBEBC47404 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 13:44:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7E23214AF for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 13:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="NQNZEVni" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C7E23214AF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=codethink.co.uk Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Bea11/IlWz6m1kREmYX/GjNRTsvGlNhbGbCXpFM0IEg=; b=NQNZEVnioK8U194WZwzgpvWDw eFgbMwjUNiqs9CrW1czNctaU8VyG1qpvIJAVaxPpg4HclLqVQJr8uj/YgctbLobM+gIxCAEiUX/c5 LI2AN9svN7eHT8yDGYaBsys50OfFae9LdVeYXbWpKcjL7V2S7gxLcZaGdf11KRwL1IIz3UST5RPuY 4yje8zxlcKn1McV86sZM568c3/p1bP8E+ojCAmp0NXyyrPM+M6Ta4FaWWU6qpBYikw1rOTtlEt5ez QqkNLLGuMFYUIlo+J9s+sOPL8KeT2bQEmQQCUW1EkiWTZ+j5XbfLRwSAg9D/cFY/ZAZFgB5x9acUK OCDMzNfuw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iIvDb-00016x-7F; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 13:44:31 +0000 Received: from imap1.codethink.co.uk ([176.9.8.82]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iIvDX-00016J-BD for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 13:44:28 +0000 Received: from [167.98.27.226] (helo=[10.35.5.173]) by imap1.codethink.co.uk with esmtpsa (Exim 4.84_2 #1 (Debian)) id 1iIvDV-0005kC-UC; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:44:26 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: add kernel/fork.c function definitions To: Christoph Hellwig References: <20191009140637.12443-1-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> <20191009153316.GA25186@infradead.org> From: Ben Dooks Organization: Codethink Limited. Message-ID: <12dd599c-e7e8-2cdb-4363-fdf18c023bef@codethink.co.uk> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:44:25 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191009153316.GA25186@infradead.org> Content-Language: en-GB X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191011_064427_528793_B86CBA24 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.77 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk, Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 09/10/2019 16:33, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 03:06:37PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: >> Add the definitions of arch_release_task_struct, >> arch_task_cache_init and arch_dup_task_struct which >> are used in kernel/fork.c but defined in various >> architecture's . > > So please lift them into a common header. In fact I'm pretty sure > I had that comment before when people did the same blind sparse > cleanups for riscv.. Does anyone have a preference to where these should go? -- Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/ Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel