From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: perf: reset counters on all CPUs during initialisation
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:46:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1300895204-10544-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> (raw)
ARMv7 dictates that the interrupt-enable and count-enable registers for
each PMU counter are UNKNOWN following core reset.
This patch adds a new (optional) function pointer to struct arm_pmu for
resetting the PMU state during init. The reset function is called on
each CPU via an arch_initcall in the generic ARM perf_event code and
allows the PMU backend to write sane values to any UNKNOWN registers.
Cc: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
Hi Jean, here's the updated patch following the discussion on the list.
Please let me know what you think.
Will
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
index 53f6068..b23a364 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ struct arm_pmu {
void (*write_counter)(int idx, u32 val);
void (*start)(void);
void (*stop)(void);
+ void (*reset)(void *);
const unsigned (*cache_map)[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX]
[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX];
@@ -612,6 +613,19 @@ static struct pmu pmu = {
#include "perf_event_v6.c"
#include "perf_event_v7.c"
+/*
+ * Ensure the PMU has sane values out of reset.
+ * This requires SMP to be available, so exists as a separate initcall.
+ */
+static int __init
+armpmu_reset(void)
+{
+ if (armpmu && armpmu->reset)
+ return on_each_cpu(armpmu->reset, NULL, 1);
+ return 0;
+}
+arch_initcall(armpmu_reset);
+
static int __init
init_hw_perf_events(void)
{
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
index 2aa83c2..4960686 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
@@ -849,6 +849,18 @@ static int armv7pmu_get_event_idx(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
}
}
+static void armv7pmu_reset(void *info)
+{
+ u32 idx, nb_cnt = armpmu->num_events;
+
+ /* The counter and interrupt enable registers are unknown at reset. */
+ for (idx = 1; idx < nb_cnt; ++idx)
+ armv7pmu_disable_event(NULL, idx);
+
+ /* Initialize & Reset PMNC: C and P bits */
+ armv7_pmnc_write(ARMV7_PMNC_P | ARMV7_PMNC_C);
+}
+
static struct arm_pmu armv7pmu = {
.handle_irq = armv7pmu_handle_irq,
.enable = armv7pmu_enable_event,
@@ -858,17 +870,15 @@ static struct arm_pmu armv7pmu = {
.get_event_idx = armv7pmu_get_event_idx,
.start = armv7pmu_start,
.stop = armv7pmu_stop,
+ .reset = armv7pmu_reset,
.raw_event_mask = 0xFF,
.max_period = (1LLU << 32) - 1,
};
-static u32 __init armv7_reset_read_pmnc(void)
+static u32 __init armv7_read_num_pmnc_events(void)
{
u32 nb_cnt;
- /* Initialize & Reset PMNC: C and P bits */
- armv7_pmnc_write(ARMV7_PMNC_P | ARMV7_PMNC_C);
-
/* Read the nb of CNTx counters supported from PMNC */
nb_cnt = (armv7_pmnc_read() >> ARMV7_PMNC_N_SHIFT) & ARMV7_PMNC_N_MASK;
@@ -882,7 +892,7 @@ static const struct arm_pmu *__init armv7_a8_pmu_init(void)
armv7pmu.name = "ARMv7 Cortex-A8";
armv7pmu.cache_map = &armv7_a8_perf_cache_map;
armv7pmu.event_map = &armv7_a8_perf_map;
- armv7pmu.num_events = armv7_reset_read_pmnc();
+ armv7pmu.num_events = armv7_read_num_pmnc_events();
return &armv7pmu;
}
@@ -892,7 +902,7 @@ static const struct arm_pmu *__init armv7_a9_pmu_init(void)
armv7pmu.name = "ARMv7 Cortex-A9";
armv7pmu.cache_map = &armv7_a9_perf_cache_map;
armv7pmu.event_map = &armv7_a9_perf_map;
- armv7pmu.num_events = armv7_reset_read_pmnc();
+ armv7pmu.num_events = armv7_read_num_pmnc_events();
return &armv7pmu;
}
#else
--
1.7.0.4
next reply other threads:[~2011-03-23 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-23 15:46 Will Deacon [this message]
2011-03-24 16:22 ` [PATCH v2] ARM: perf: reset counters on all CPUs during initialisation Will Deacon
[not found] ` <-978680943347076223@unknownmsgid>
2011-03-25 10:10 ` Jean Pihet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1300895204-10544-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).