From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Koul, Vinod) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 10:08:10 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] dmaengine: add ep93xx DMA support In-Reply-To: <20110525190055.GB2996@acer> References: <1306310403.30236.94.camel@vkoul-udesk3> <20110525190055.GB2996@acer> Message-ID: <1306384690.30236.202.camel@vkoul-udesk3> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 00:30 +0530, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:30:03PM +0530, Koul, Vinod wrote: > > > > Which tree are these patches going thru? > > I was hoping that the dmaengine driver itself would go via dmaengine tree (is > it you or Dan who maintain it?) and rest of the patches probably through their > respective trees. However, since there are dependencies between the patches, > I'm not entirely sure how to proceed with these. Any ideas appreciated :) Okay, I can take the DMA one only. It stoo late for .40, I can take it for .41 or whatever that turns out to be > Fortunately arch/arm/configs/ep93xx_defconfig doesn't have audio nor SPI > enabled by default so it shouldn't matter if the patches go out of order to > the mainline. -- ~Vinod