From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dedekind1@gmail.com (Artem Bityutskiy) Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:01:49 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] ATMEL, AVR32: inline nand partition table access In-Reply-To: References: <1306676962-22308-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> <1306935129.1097.3.camel@hcegtvedt.norway.atmel.com> Message-ID: <1306940509.4405.121.camel@localhost> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 18:54 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > On 6/1/11, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 17:49 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > >> Currently atmel_nand driver used by AT91 and AVR32 calls a special > >> callback > >> which return nand partition table and number of partitions. However in all > >> boards this callback returns just static data. So drop this callback and > >> make atmel_nand use partition table provided statically via platform_data. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > > > > Thanks for this update, always nice seeing code being optimized. I > > really can't recall why it was made like this in the first place... > > > > For the AVR32 related parts: > > > > Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt > > > > > > > > Will this go through the linux-mtd tree (since it spans two archs) or > > should it go through an arch tree? > > On one hand, I'd prefer for this to go through the linux-mtd, if noone objects, > as I'd also like to submit several (a pile) patches cleaning up mtd > partitioning, which would depend on this. > > OTOH, I think there will be a cleanup of AT91 platform, which would bring > lot's of conflicts with this patch, if it goes through linux-mtd. Meanwhile, while you are thinking, I've put this patch to the l2-mtd-2.6 tree. Please, let me know if you decide to take a non-mtd path - then I'll drop it. And if you want to see this in linux-next - ping dwmw2. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (????? ????????)