From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 0/4] ARM: pmu: improve PMU type identification
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:40:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1308148804-5518-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
Hi,
This is version 2 of the patches originally posted here:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2011-June/052865.html
Changes since v1 include:
* Added Acks from Jamie Iles & Rob Herring.
* Add "arm-pmu" binding to the platform_device_id table, as driver name
matching is not used when platform_driver::id_table exists.
* Fixed name clash in PLAT_MATCH_PMU macro.
* Removed unnecessary casts for platform_device_id::driver_data.
* Aligned trailing backslashes on multi-line *_MATCH_PMU macros.
* Removed spaces after casts.
The patches use {of,platform}_device_id tables to provide the PMU type, which
can be used similarly (the macros make entries look identical apart from the
{plat,of} prefix). This allows us to stop (ab)using platform_device::id, and
should allow for easier addition/modification of PMU driver bindings.
BSPs need no longer care about the Type of PMUs they register; as long as a
binding exists the type will be assigned correctly.
Rob, Jamie: would you mind if patches 3 & 4 were squashed together?
Patch 4 depends heavily on patch 3, and there doesn't seem to be a clean way of
fixing that.
Mark
Mark Rutland (4):
ARM: pmu: refactor reservation
ARM: pmu: reject duplicate PMU registrations
ARM: pmu: add OF probing support
ARM: pmu: add platform_device_id table support
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt | 22 ++++++
arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h | 2 +-
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 4 +-
arch/arm/kernel/pmu.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
4 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt
next reply other threads:[~2011-06-15 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-15 14:40 Mark Rutland [this message]
2011-06-15 14:40 ` [PATCHv2 1/4] ARM: pmu: refactor reservation Mark Rutland
2011-06-15 14:40 ` [PATCHv2 2/4] ARM: pmu: reject duplicate PMU registrations Mark Rutland
2011-06-15 14:40 ` [PATCHv2 3/4] ARM: pmu: add OF probing support Mark Rutland
2011-06-15 14:40 ` [PATCHv2 4/4] ARM: pmu: add platform_device_id table support Mark Rutland
2011-06-15 14:45 ` [PATCHv2 0/4] ARM: pmu: improve PMU type identification Jamie Iles
2011-06-15 15:01 ` Rob Herring
2011-06-29 9:26 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-06-29 9:36 ` Will Deacon
2011-06-29 10:42 ` Jamie Iles
2011-06-29 13:32 ` Jean Pihet
2011-06-29 15:29 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1308148804-5518-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).