From: per.forlin@linaro.org (Per Forlin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 12/12] mmc: block: add handling for two parallel block requests in issue_rw_rq
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:11:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1309248717-14606-13-git-send-email-per.forlin@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309248717-14606-1-git-send-email-per.forlin@linaro.org>
Change mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq() to become asynchronous.
The execution flow looks like this:
The mmc-queue calls issue_rw_rq(), which sends the request
to the host and returns back to the mmc-queue. The mmc-queue calls
issue_rw_rq() again with a new request. This new request is prepared,
in isuue_rw_rq(), then it waits for the active request to complete before
pushing it to the host. When to mmc-queue is empty it will call
isuue_rw_rq() with req=NULL to finish off the active request
without starting a new request.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org>
---
drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
drivers/mmc/card/queue.c | 17 +++++++---
drivers/mmc/card/queue.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
index 7ed2c68..825741e 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
@@ -822,12 +822,14 @@ static inline void mmc_apply_rel_rw(struct mmc_blk_request *brq,
R1_CC_ERROR | /* Card controller error */ \
R1_ERROR) /* General/unknown error */
-int mmc_blk_err_check(struct mmc_blk_request *brq,
- struct request *req,
- struct mmc_card *card,
- struct mmc_blk_data *md)
+static int mmc_blk_err_check(struct mmc_card *card,
+ struct mmc_async_req *areq)
{
- int ret = MMC_BLK_SUCCESS;
+ enum mmc_blk_status ret = MMC_BLK_SUCCESS;
+ struct mmc_queue_req *mq_mrq = container_of(areq, struct mmc_queue_req,
+ mmc_active);
+ struct mmc_blk_request *brq = &mq_mrq->brq;
+ struct request *req = mq_mrq->req;
/*
* sbc.error indicates a problem with the set block count
@@ -1038,24 +1040,41 @@ static void mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq,
brq->data.sg_len = i;
}
+ mqrq->mmc_active.mrq = &brq->mrq;
+ mqrq->mmc_active.err_check = mmc_blk_err_check;
+
mmc_queue_bounce_pre(mqrq);
}
-static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
+static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc)
{
struct mmc_blk_data *md = mq->data;
struct mmc_card *card = md->queue.card;
struct mmc_blk_request *brq = &mq->mqrq_cur->brq;
int ret = 1, disable_multi = 0, retry = 0;
enum mmc_blk_status status;
+ struct mmc_queue_req *mq_rq;
+ struct request *req;
+ struct mmc_async_req *areq;
- do {
- mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(mq->mqrq_cur, card, disable_multi, mq);
- mmc_wait_for_req(card->host, &brq->mrq);
+ if (!rqc && !mq->mqrq_prev->req)
+ return 0;
- mmc_queue_bounce_post(mq->mqrq_cur);
+ do {
+ if (rqc) {
+ mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(mq->mqrq_cur, card, 0, mq);
+ areq = &mq->mqrq_cur->mmc_active;
+ } else
+ areq = NULL;
+ areq = mmc_start_req(card->host, areq, (int *) &status);
+ if (!areq)
+ return 0;
+
+ mq_rq = container_of(areq, struct mmc_queue_req, mmc_active);
+ brq = &mq_rq->brq;
+ req = mq_rq->req;
+ mmc_queue_bounce_post(mq_rq);
- status = mmc_blk_err_check(brq, req, card, md);
switch (status) {
case MMC_BLK_SUCCESS:
case MMC_BLK_PARTIAL:
@@ -1066,6 +1085,13 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
ret = __blk_end_request(req, 0,
brq->data.bytes_xfered);
spin_unlock_irq(&md->lock);
+ if (status == MMC_BLK_SUCCESS && ret) {
+ /* If this happen it is a bug */
+ printk(KERN_ERR "%s BUG rq_tot %d d_xfer %d\n",
+ __func__, blk_rq_bytes(req),
+ brq->data.bytes_xfered);
+ goto cmd_abort;
+ }
break;
case MMC_BLK_CMD_ERR:
goto cmd_err;
@@ -1087,9 +1113,19 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
ret = __blk_end_request(req, -EIO,
brq->data.blksz);
spin_unlock_irq(&md->lock);
+ if (!ret)
+ goto start_new_req;
break;
}
+ if (ret) {
+ /*
+ * In case of a none complete request
+ * prepare it again and resend.
+ */
+ mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(mq_rq, card, disable_multi, mq);
+ mmc_start_req(card->host, &mq_rq->mmc_active, NULL);
+ }
} while (ret);
return 1;
@@ -1124,6 +1160,12 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
ret = __blk_end_request(req, -EIO, blk_rq_cur_bytes(req));
spin_unlock_irq(&md->lock);
+ start_new_req:
+ if (rqc) {
+ mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(mq->mqrq_cur, card, 0, mq);
+ mmc_start_req(card->host, &mq->mqrq_cur->mmc_active, NULL);
+ }
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1133,26 +1175,34 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
struct mmc_blk_data *md = mq->data;
struct mmc_card *card = md->queue.card;
- mmc_claim_host(card->host);
+ if (req && !mq->mqrq_prev->req)
+ /* claim host only for the first request */
+ mmc_claim_host(card->host);
+
ret = mmc_blk_part_switch(card, md);
if (ret) {
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
- if (req->cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD) {
+ if (req && req->cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD) {
+ /* complete ongoing async transfer before issuing discard */
+ if (card->host->areq)
+ mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(mq, NULL);
if (req->cmd_flags & REQ_SECURE)
ret = mmc_blk_issue_secdiscard_rq(mq, req);
else
ret = mmc_blk_issue_discard_rq(mq, req);
- } else if (req->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH) {
+ } else if (req && req->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH) {
ret = mmc_blk_issue_flush(mq, req);
} else {
ret = mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(mq, req);
}
out:
- mmc_release_host(card->host);
+ if (!req)
+ /* release host only when there are no more requests */
+ mmc_release_host(card->host);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
index d69d954..8c51a54 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ static int mmc_queue_thread(void *d)
down(&mq->thread_sem);
do {
struct request *req = NULL;
+ struct mmc_queue_req *tmp;
spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
@@ -59,7 +60,10 @@ static int mmc_queue_thread(void *d)
mq->mqrq_cur->req = req;
spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
- if (!req) {
+ if (req || mq->mqrq_prev->req) {
+ set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+ mq->issue_fn(mq, req);
+ } else {
if (kthread_should_stop()) {
set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
break;
@@ -67,11 +71,14 @@ static int mmc_queue_thread(void *d)
up(&mq->thread_sem);
schedule();
down(&mq->thread_sem);
- continue;
}
- set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
- mq->issue_fn(mq, req);
+ /* Current request becomes previous request and vice versa. */
+ mq->mqrq_prev->brq.mrq.data = NULL;
+ mq->mqrq_prev->req = NULL;
+ tmp = mq->mqrq_prev;
+ mq->mqrq_prev = mq->mqrq_cur;
+ mq->mqrq_cur = tmp;
} while (1);
up(&mq->thread_sem);
@@ -97,7 +104,7 @@ static void mmc_request(struct request_queue *q)
return;
}
- if (!mq->mqrq_cur->req)
+ if (!mq->mqrq_cur->req && !mq->mqrq_prev->req)
wake_up_process(mq->thread);
}
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h
index 1a637d2..d2a1eb4 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h
+++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ struct mmc_queue_req {
char *bounce_buf;
struct scatterlist *bounce_sg;
unsigned int bounce_sg_len;
+ struct mmc_async_req mmc_active;
};
struct mmc_queue {
--
1.7.4.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-28 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-28 8:11 [PATCH v8 00/12] use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency Per Forlin
2011-06-28 8:11 ` [PATCH v8 01/12] mmc: core: add non-blocking mmc request function Per Forlin
2011-06-28 8:11 ` [PATCH v8 02/12] omap_hsmmc: add support for pre_req and post_req Per Forlin
2011-06-28 8:11 ` [PATCH v8 03/12] mmci: implement pre_req() and post_req() Per Forlin
2011-06-28 8:11 ` [PATCH v8 04/12] mmc: mmc_test: add debugfs file to list all tests Per Forlin
2011-06-28 8:11 ` [PATCH v8 05/12] mmc: mmc_test: add test for non-blocking transfers Per Forlin
2011-07-01 13:29 ` Per Forlin
2011-06-28 8:11 ` [PATCH v8 06/12] mmc: mmc_test: test to measure how sg_len affect performance Per Forlin
2011-07-01 13:33 ` Per Forlin
2011-06-28 8:11 ` [PATCH v8 07/12] mmc: block: add member in mmc queue struct to hold request data Per Forlin
2011-06-28 8:11 ` [PATCH v8 08/12] mmc: block: add a block request prepare function Per Forlin
2011-06-28 8:11 ` [PATCH v8 09/12] mmc: block: move error code in issue_rw_rq to a separate function Per Forlin
2011-06-28 8:11 ` [PATCH v8 10/12] mmc: queue: add a second mmc queue request member Per Forlin
2011-06-28 8:11 ` [PATCH v8 11/12] mmc: core: add random fault injection Per Forlin
2011-06-28 8:11 ` Per Forlin [this message]
2011-06-28 9:39 ` [PATCH v8 12/12] mmc: block: add handling for two parallel block requests in issue_rw_rq Per Forlin
2011-06-28 9:54 ` [PATCH v8 00/12] use nonblock mmc requests to minimize latency Kyungmin Park
2011-06-30 12:36 ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-06-30 13:11 ` S, Venkatraman
2011-06-30 13:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-06-30 13:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-01 16:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-02 12:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-07-02 19:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-03 20:53 ` Per Forlin
2011-07-04 1:07 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-07-01 14:39 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1309248717-14606-13-git-send-email-per.forlin@linaro.org \
--to=per.forlin@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).