From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v10 0/4] Consolidating GIC per-cpu interrupts
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 18:04:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1312218260-14866-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> (raw)
The current GIC per-cpu interrupts (aka PPIs) suffer from a number of
problems:
- They use a completely separate scheme to handle the interrupts,
mostly because the PPI concept doesn't really match the kernel view
of an interrupt.
- PPIs can only be used by the timer code, unless we add more low-level
assembly code.
- The local timer code can only be used by devices generating PPIs,
and not SPIs.
- At least one platform (msm) has started implementing its own
alternative scheme.
- Some low-level code gets duplicated, as usual...
As the previous solution which tried to map PPIs to normal interrupts
has been proved to be buggy, I've opted to a much simpler scheme
(based on Russell's input).
The proposed solution is to handle the interrupt using the same path
as SPIs, with a common handler for all PPIs. Each PPI can be requested
using gic_request_ppi(), similar to request_irq(). The local timer
code is updated to reflect these changes.
Patches against next-20110801, tested on PB11MP. As this patch series
is quite different from the previous one, I've dropped all previous
acks from platform maintainers.
next reply other threads:[~2011-08-01 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-01 17:04 Marc Zyngier [this message]
2011-08-01 17:04 ` [RFC PATCH v10 1/4] ARM: gic: consolidate PPI handling Marc Zyngier
2011-08-01 17:04 ` [RFC PATCH v10 2/4] ARM: gic: Add PPI registration interface Marc Zyngier
2011-08-01 17:04 ` [RFC PATCH v10 3/4] ARM: local timers: drop local_timer_ack() Marc Zyngier
2011-08-01 17:04 ` [RFC PATCH v10 4/4] ARM: gic: add compute_irqnr macro for exynos4 Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1312218260-14866-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).