linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 02/15] ARM: perf: only register a CPU PMU when present
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:55:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1313416516-8006-3-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313416516-8006-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>

Currently, an "empty" struct pmu is registered as the CPU PMU,
regardless of whether there is a physical PMU. This burdens the
accessor functions with checks to see whether a PMU is actually
present.

This patch changes initialisation to register a PMU only if there is a
supported PMU present, and removes the checks that this change makes
redundant.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c |   18 ++----------------
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
index 5d60c9c..753648c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -250,9 +250,6 @@ armpmu_stop(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
 {
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 
-	if (!armpmu)
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * ARM pmu always has to update the counter, so ignore
 	 * PERF_EF_UPDATE, see comments in armpmu_start().
@@ -270,9 +267,6 @@ armpmu_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
 {
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 
-	if (!armpmu)
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * ARM pmu always has to reprogram the period, so ignore
 	 * PERF_EF_RELOAD, see the comment below.
@@ -567,9 +561,6 @@ static int armpmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
 		return -ENOENT;
 	}
 
-	if (!armpmu)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
 	event->destroy = hw_perf_event_destroy;
 
 	if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&active_events)) {
@@ -599,9 +590,6 @@ static void armpmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
 	int idx, enabled = 0;
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
 
-	if (!armpmu)
-		return;
-
 	for (idx = 0; idx < armpmu->num_events; ++idx) {
 		struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[idx];
 
@@ -618,8 +606,7 @@ static void armpmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
 
 static void armpmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
 {
-	if (armpmu)
-		armpmu->stop();
+	armpmu->stop();
 }
 
 static struct pmu pmu = {
@@ -738,12 +725,11 @@ init_hw_perf_events(void)
 	if (armpmu) {
 		pr_info("enabled with %s PMU driver, %d counters available\n",
 			armpmu->name, armpmu->num_events);
+		perf_pmu_register(&pmu, "cpu", PERF_TYPE_RAW);
 	} else {
 		pr_info("no hardware support available\n");
 	}
 
-	perf_pmu_register(&pmu, "cpu", PERF_TYPE_RAW);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 early_initcall(init_hw_perf_events);
-- 
1.7.0.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-08-15 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-15 13:55 [RFC PATCH 00/15] ARM: perf: support multiple PMUs Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 01/15] perf: provide PMU when initing events Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 03/15] ARM: perf: clean up event group validation Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 04/15] ARM: perf: remove active_mask Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 05/15] ARM: perf: move active_events into struct arm_pmu Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 06/15] ARM: perf: move platform device to " Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 07/15] ARM: perf: indirect access to cpu_hw_events Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 08/15] ARM: perf: remove unnecessary armpmu->stop Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 09/15] ARM: perf: lock PMU registers per-CPU Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 10/15] ARM: perf: add type field to struct arm_pmu Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 11/15] ARM: perf: refactor event mapping Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 12/15] ARM: perf: add support for multiple PMUs Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 13/15] ARM: perf: remove event limit from pmu_hw_events Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 14/15] ARM: perf: remove cpu-related misnomers Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 15/15] ARM: perf: move arm_pmu into <asm/pmu.h> Mark Rutland
2011-08-17 14:12 ` [RFC PATCH 00/15] ARM: perf: support multiple PMUs Jamie Iles
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-27  9:31 [RFC PATCH 02/15] ARM: perf: only register a CPU PMU when present Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1313416516-8006-3-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).