From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 07/15] ARM: perf: indirect access to cpu_hw_events
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:55:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1313416516-8006-8-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313416516-8006-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Currently, cpu_hw_events is a global per-CPU variable. To enable
support for multiple PMUs, there needs to be a mapping from an instance
of arm_pmu to its cpu_hw_events. Additionally, as system PMUs are not
CPU-affine, they should not have this stored per-CPU.
This patch moves access to the hardware events data behind an accessor
function (arm_pmu::get_hw_events). This allows each instance to have
its own hardware event data, which can be stored per-CPU or globally as
required.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
index 1d648d1..9d6ac99 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ struct arm_pmu {
struct mutex reserve_mutex;
u64 max_period;
struct platform_device *plat_device;
+ struct cpu_hw_events *(*get_hw_events)(void);
};
/* Set at runtime when we know what CPU type we are. */
@@ -284,7 +285,7 @@ armpmu_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
static void
armpmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
{
- struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
+ struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = armpmu->get_hw_events();
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
int idx = hwc->idx;
@@ -300,7 +301,7 @@ armpmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
static int
armpmu_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
{
- struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
+ struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = armpmu->get_hw_events();
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
int idx;
int err = 0;
@@ -585,7 +586,7 @@ static void armpmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
{
/* Enable all of the perf events on hardware. */
int idx, enabled = 0;
- struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
+ struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = armpmu->get_hw_events();
for (idx = 0; idx < armpmu->num_events; ++idx) {
struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[idx];
@@ -678,6 +679,16 @@ static int __init register_pmu_driver(void)
}
device_initcall(register_pmu_driver);
+static struct cpu_hw_events *armpmu_get_cpu_events(void)
+{
+ return &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
+}
+
+static void __init cpu_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
+{
+ armpmu->get_hw_events = armpmu_get_cpu_events;
+}
+
/*
* CPU PMU identification and registration.
*/
@@ -728,6 +739,7 @@ init_hw_perf_events(void)
if (armpmu) {
pr_info("enabled with %s PMU driver, %d counters available\n",
armpmu->name, armpmu->num_events);
+ cpu_pmu_init(armpmu);
armpmu_init(armpmu);
perf_pmu_register(&pmu, "cpu", PERF_TYPE_RAW);
} else {
--
1.7.0.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-15 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-15 13:55 [RFC PATCH 00/15] ARM: perf: support multiple PMUs Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 01/15] perf: provide PMU when initing events Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 02/15] ARM: perf: only register a CPU PMU when present Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 03/15] ARM: perf: clean up event group validation Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 04/15] ARM: perf: remove active_mask Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 05/15] ARM: perf: move active_events into struct arm_pmu Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 06/15] ARM: perf: move platform device to " Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 08/15] ARM: perf: remove unnecessary armpmu->stop Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 09/15] ARM: perf: lock PMU registers per-CPU Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 10/15] ARM: perf: add type field to struct arm_pmu Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 11/15] ARM: perf: refactor event mapping Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 12/15] ARM: perf: add support for multiple PMUs Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 13/15] ARM: perf: remove event limit from pmu_hw_events Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 14/15] ARM: perf: remove cpu-related misnomers Mark Rutland
2011-08-15 13:55 ` [RFC PATCH 15/15] ARM: perf: move arm_pmu into <asm/pmu.h> Mark Rutland
2011-08-17 14:12 ` [RFC PATCH 00/15] ARM: perf: support multiple PMUs Jamie Iles
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-04 8:23 [RFC PATCH 07/15] ARM: perf: indirect access to cpu_hw_events Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1313416516-8006-8-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).