From: dedekind1@gmail.com (Artem Bityutskiy)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: GPMI-NAND Status?
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:18:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1313425121.8691.31.camel@sauron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040.45443.810005.525431@ipc1.ka-ro>
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 07:41 +0200, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> > As explained in the thread linked above, this issue should be fixed in your
> > flashing tool, _not_ in your driver. The nand device you are using does not
> > support programming pages multiple times in a row; pretending it does in the
> >
> It's not a problem of the device (Samsung K9F1G08U0B in my case)! The
> problem is that the controller generates an ECC code that is non-FF
> for all-FF data, which JFFS2 cannot handle properly.
I believe that it does not matter for the kernel community that your
specific device can survive multiple writes. I certainly does matter for
you, so if you want a quick fix - just change your kernel, but I would
not recommend to do this.
We (the community) care about the _general_ case - in general, only one
write is allowed, period. Once the JFFS2 or/and the flashing tool is
fixed - the problem will go away.
Let me put it this way - hacking the driver will just hide the issue
deeper - we'll have this issue popped up again a bit later and because
of hacks like that [1] it will be more confusing. Let's avoid this.
Also, someone pointed in that thread that if I write data to NAND - I
want my data to be ECC-protected. Please, explain why my data should be
unprotected if it happened to be just 2KiB of 0xFFs covering whole NAND
page?
Ivan provided much better explanation, showing that even with NOP 4
flashes there may be problems (e.g., 1 write of all 0xFFs + 4 writes
from the user).
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2011-July/037181.html
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-15 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-05 13:51 GPMI-NAND Status? Wolfram Sang
2011-08-08 6:21 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-08 9:19 ` Koen Beel
2011-08-08 10:37 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-08 12:42 ` Koen Beel
2011-08-09 6:36 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-09 7:58 ` Koen Beel
2011-08-09 8:18 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-09 8:25 ` Koen Beel
2011-08-09 5:11 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-09 6:25 ` Koen Beel
2011-08-09 6:40 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-09 9:45 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-08-09 9:35 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-08-09 10:54 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-09 20:42 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-08-08 9:12 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-09 9:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-08-09 10:41 ` Huang Shijie
2011-08-09 11:36 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-08-14 8:11 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-08-14 18:31 ` Wolfram Sang
2011-08-15 5:41 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-08-15 6:30 ` Lin Tony-B19295
2011-08-15 8:41 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-08-15 8:29 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-08-15 9:31 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-08-15 12:54 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-08-15 13:37 ` Lothar Waßmann
2011-08-15 16:34 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-15 16:18 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2011-08-15 16:22 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-15 16:57 ` Ivan Djelic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1313425121.8691.31.camel@sauron \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).