From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Koul, Vinod) Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:31:16 +0530 Subject: [PATCH V5 00/15] To use DMA generic APIs for Samsung DMA In-Reply-To: <000701cc596f$08811160$19833420$%kim@samsung.com> References: <1311744697-10264-1-git-send-email-boojin.kim@samsung.com> <1312821923.1539.37.camel@vkoul-udesk3> <015101cc57f8$0d7b1da0$287158e0$%kim@samsung.com> <1313101649.1603.27.camel@vkoul-udesk3> <000701cc596f$08811160$19833420$%kim@samsung.com> Message-ID: <1313492476.1603.39.camel@vkoul-udesk3> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 13:11 +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Koul, Vinod wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 16:26 +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > > Koul, Vinod wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 18:53 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Boojin Kim > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > This patchset adds support DMA generic APIs for Samsung DMA. > > > > > > > > > > Patches look good to me, > > > > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Vinod Koul > > > > > > > > Do you want these to go thru slave-dma tree or arm tree, I am okay with > > > > either... > > > > > > Hi Vinod, > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > I'd like to keep its topic branch in my tree to avoid conflicts with other samsung > > stuff and I think, it should be merged into your slave-dma tree also for same > > reason. > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git #next/topic- > > dma-pl330 > > > > > > Or if you want to make some branch for it in your tree, please let me know so > > that I can merge it in my tree also. > > Okay can you update this branch with latest patchset (I think there were > > few comments on last patchset). Once you add all acks let me know the > > branch, I will merge it to my next > > Hi, > > I updated it so that you can merge it to yours. > I think, if any fixing is required on that, it should be small so can be fixed easily after this merging. > > If any problems, please let me know :) > Well, that not how things are supposed to be done. Fixing an error introduced is not recommended, rather original patch set should be fixed. Since you have already done 5 posting of your patch series, I am okay if you split things up, send me the parts that have already been reviewed and acked. I will host them on a branch for you. Once rest is reviewed and acked, I will merge this entire branch to my next. -- ~Vinod