From: msalter@redhat.com (Mark Salter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] usb: ehci: make HC see up-to-date qh/qtd descriptor ASAP
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:41:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1315521779.2313.29.camel@deneb.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110831193525.GA27476@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 20:35 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:19:33PM +0100, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On 08/31/2011 12:51 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > Another thing that Marc and I tried on OMAP4 was not bringing up the secondary
> > > CPU during boot (by commenting out most of smp_init). In this case, I/O
> > > performance was good until we tried to online the secondary CPU. The online
> > > failed but after that the I/O performance was certainly degraded.
> > >
> >
> > Was the SCU enabled at that point? One diff between nosmp boot and
> > offlining the 2nd core would be that the SCU remains enabled in the
> > latter case. I think the SCU does not get enabled for nosmp.
>
> Our rudimentary test (printing out the SCU control register during boot)
> showed that it *was* enabled for nosmp. I think this is due to the secure
> world having to do that on OMAP so it's probably not true for other
> platforms.
I've done a little test and found that turning on the MMU of the second
core causes the problem to show up. I patched head.S so I stopped the
second core in an infinite loop just before turning on the MMU. The
system continues booting on core#0 and I see ~20MB/s with hdparm -t to
an attached usb disk. Same setup but with second core being stopped with
infinite loop just after MMU is enabled shows ~5MB/s. So whatever is
going wrong, its not because of anything the second core is doing beyond
turning on its MMU and doing an empty loop.
--Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-08 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-30 16:03 [PATCH] usb: ehci: make HC see up-to-date qh/qtd descriptor ASAP ming.lei at canonical.com
2011-08-30 16:15 ` Alan Stern
2011-08-30 16:38 ` Mark Salter
2011-08-30 17:15 ` Alan Stern
2011-08-30 18:45 ` Mark Salter
2011-08-30 17:26 ` Will Deacon
2011-08-30 17:48 ` Greg KH
2011-08-30 17:54 ` Will Deacon
2011-08-31 0:23 ` Chen Peter-B29397
2011-08-31 8:49 ` Will Deacon
2011-08-31 12:33 ` Chen Peter-B29397
2011-08-31 13:43 ` Mark Salter
2011-08-31 15:21 ` Will Deacon
2011-08-31 15:27 ` Mark Salter
2011-08-31 16:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2011-08-31 16:55 ` Marc Dietrich
2011-09-01 10:34 ` Marc Zyngier
2011-09-01 11:13 ` Marc Dietich
2011-09-01 19:08 ` Stephen Warren
2011-09-02 9:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2011-09-02 17:07 ` Stephen Warren
2011-09-02 11:13 ` Marc Dietich
2011-08-31 17:46 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-08-31 17:51 ` Will Deacon
2011-08-31 18:19 ` Rob Herring
2011-08-31 18:35 ` Mark Salter
2011-08-31 18:49 ` Rob Herring
2011-08-31 18:58 ` Mark Salter
2011-08-31 19:35 ` Will Deacon
2011-09-08 22:41 ` Mark Salter [this message]
2011-10-31 6:49 ` Pandita, Vikram
2011-08-31 0:56 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1315521779.2313.29.camel@deneb.redhat.com \
--to=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).