From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: eric.miao@linaro.org (eric.miao at linaro.org) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 21:49:46 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: make cpu_is_v6_unaligned() and safe_usermode() independent of CONFIG_PROC_FS Message-ID: <1315630186-29654-1-git-send-email-eric.miao@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org From: Eric Miao Signed-off-by: Eric Miao --- It turned out both cpu_is_v6_unaligned and safe_usermode() could be referenced without CONFIG_PROC_FS being defined. arch/arm/mm/alignment.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c b/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c index cfbcf8b..c335c76 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c @@ -86,16 +86,6 @@ core_param(alignment, ai_usermode, int, 0600); #define UM_FIXUP (1 << 1) #define UM_SIGNAL (1 << 2) -#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS -static const char *usermode_action[] = { - "ignored", - "warn", - "fixup", - "fixup+warn", - "signal", - "signal+warn" -}; - /* Return true if and only if the ARMv6 unaligned access model is in use. */ static bool cpu_is_v6_unaligned(void) { @@ -123,6 +113,16 @@ static int safe_usermode(int new_usermode, bool warn) return new_usermode; } +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS +static const char *usermode_action[] = { + "ignored", + "warn", + "fixup", + "fixup+warn", + "signal", + "signal+warn" +}; + static int alignment_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) { seq_printf(m, "User:\t\t%lu\n", ai_user); -- 1.7.4.1