From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pullip.cho@samsung.com (KyongHo Cho) Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 11:02:50 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 4/4] iommu/exynos: Use bus_set_iommu instead of register_iommu In-Reply-To: <1316829770-21949-1-git-send-email-pullip.cho@samsung.com> References: <1316829770-21949-1-git-send-email-pullip.cho@samsung.com> Message-ID: <1316829770-21949-5-git-send-email-pullip.cho@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org This replaces register_iommu() with bus_set_iommu() according to the suggestion of Joerg Roedel. Cc: Joerg Roedel Signed-off-by: KyongHo Cho --- drivers/iommu/exynos_iommu.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/exynos_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/exynos_iommu.c index fe5b5d8..148e238 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/exynos_iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/exynos_iommu.c @@ -852,7 +852,7 @@ static int __init exynos_iommu_init(void) if (!l2table_cachep) return -ENOMEM; - register_iommu(&exynos_iommu_ops); + bus_set_iommu(&platform_bus_type, &omap_iommu_ops); return 0; } -- 1.7.1