From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: joe@perches.com (Joe Perches) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:26:08 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] arm/tegra: clk_get should not be fatal In-Reply-To: <1319559329-324-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> References: <1319559329-324-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> Message-ID: <1319559968.14932.5.camel@Joe-Laptop> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 19:15 +0300, pdeschrijver at nvidia.com wrote: > The timer and rtc-timer clocks aren't gated by default, so there is no reason > to crash the system if the dummy enable call failed. [] > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/timer.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/timer.c [] > @@ -186,16 +186,20 @@ static void __init tegra_init_timer(void) > int ret; > > clk = clk_get_sys("timer", NULL); > - BUG_ON(IS_ERR(clk)); > - clk_enable(clk); > + if (IS_ERR(clk)) > + pr_warning("Unable to get timer clock"); > + else > + clk_enable(clk); > > /* > * rtc registers are used by read_persistent_clock, keep the rtc clock > * enabled > */ > clk = clk_get_sys("rtc-tegra", NULL); > - BUG_ON(IS_ERR(clk)); > - clk_enable(clk); > + if (IS_ERR(clk)) > + pr_warning("Unable to get rtc-tegra clock"); > + else > + clk_enable(clk); Are these messages are really necessary? Maybe just: if (!IS_ERR(clk)) clk_enable(clk) If these are really necessary, please use pr_warn("Unable to get \n"); pr_warn and with a terminating newline.