From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: davidb@codeaurora.org (David Brown) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 11:36:04 -0700 Subject: [RFC PATCH 07/34] msm: clock-debug: Use clk_enable()/clk_disable() directly In-Reply-To: <1320258991-22325-1-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org> References: <1320258991-22325-1-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <1320258991-22325-8-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org From: Stephen Boyd The debugfs operations currently sidestep the top level enable/disable code and directly call the ops->enable/disable functions. This won't work well when we generically enable parent clocks in the toplevel clock code. Therefore call enable/disable directly from the debugfs code to get proper parent enabling. Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd Signed-off-by: David Brown --- arch/arm/mach-msm/clock-debug.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock-debug.c b/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock-debug.c index bddcbc9..a8db06d 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock-debug.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/clock-debug.c @@ -55,9 +55,9 @@ static int clock_debug_enable_set(void *data, u64 val) int rc = 0; if (val) - rc = clock->ops->enable(clock); + rc = clk_enable(clock); else - clock->ops->disable(clock); + clk_disable(clock); return rc; } -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.